UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.      )



☑    Filed by the Registrant    ☑ 



☐    Filed by a Partyparty other than the Registrant    ☐





Check the appropriate box:



☐    Preliminary Proxy Statement



☐    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only

(as (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))



☑    Definitive Proxy Statement



☐    Definitive Additional Materials



☐    Soliciting Material Pursuant tounder §240.14a-12





WD-40 COMPANY

(Name of Registrant as Specified In  Its Charter)



(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)



Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):



☑    No fee required.required

☐   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials



☐    Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)(1) and 0-11.0-11


cid:image001.jpg@01C93922.669A7680

9715 Businesspark Avenue

San Diego, California 92131

NOTICE OF 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To the Stockholders:

The 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“annual meeting”) of WD-40 Company (“Company”) will be held solely via a live audio webcast at the following virtual location and for the following purposes:





 

 

1.

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:



 

 

2.

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3.

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11

(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4.

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5.

Total fee paid:

☐   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐    Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

1.

Amount Previously Paid:

2.

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3.

Filing Party:

4.

Date Filed:


WD-40 COMPANY

9715 Businesspark Avenue

San Diego, California 92131

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To the Stockholders:

The 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of WD-40 Company will be held at the following location and for the following purposes:





 

When:

 

Tuesday, December 10, 2019,13, 2022 at 2:10:00 p.m.a.m., Pacific Time



 

 

Where:

 

WD-40 Company

9715 Businesspark Avenue

San Diego, California 92131

https://meetnow.global/M9Z7T5K

Items of Business:

1.

To elect a Board of Directors (“Board”) for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected and qualified;



2.

To hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation;



3.

To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020;2023; and



4.

To consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting.



 

 

Who Can Vote:

 

Only the stockholders of record at the close of business on October 15, 201917, 2022 are entitled to vote at the annual meeting. The Proxy Statement, enclosed form of proxy, and the Company’s 2022 Annual Report (collectively, “proxy materials”) are first sent to stockholders on or about November 2, 2022.

Attending the Virtual Annual Meeting

In order to expand access to our stockholders, this year’s annual meeting will be conducted virtually. You may attend and participate in the annual meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit your questions prior to and during the annual meeting by visiting:  https://meetnow.global/M9Z7T5K. There is no physical location for the annual meeting.

Please see “How can I participate in the virtual annual meeting?” beginning on page  1 for information about how to attend and participate in the annual meeting.



REVIEW YOUR PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS:





 

 

VIA THE INTERNET

Visit the website listed on your proxy card

 

BY MAIL

Sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope

BY TELEPHONE

Call the telephone number on your proxy card

 

IN PERSON

VIA LIVE VIRTUAL MEETING

Attend the Annual Meeting in San Diegoannual meeting at



 

https://meetnow.global/M9Z7T5K



 

 



 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Richard T. Clampitt

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

San Diego, California

October 31, 2019November 2, 2022




 

TABLETABLE OF CONTENTS



 



Page

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

FAQS AND GENERAL INFORMATION 

PRINCIPAL SECURITY HOLDERSHOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

2

PROPOSALS:

4 

ITEM NO. 1: NOMINEES FOR ELECTION ASOF DIRECTORS

AND SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

Director Independence

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

4

Nominees for Election as Directors

Board Leadership, Risk Oversight and Compensation-Related Risk

Board of Directors Meetings, Committees and Annual Meeting Attendance

10 

Board of Directors Compensation

10 

Director Compensation Table – Fiscal Year 2019

11 

Equity Holding Requirement for Directors

11 

Stockholder Communications with Board of Directors

12 

Committees

12 

ITEM NO. 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ITEM NO. 3:  RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

10 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

12 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

12 

Board Leadership, Risk Oversight and Compensation-Related Risk

12 

Board Meetings, Committees and Annual Meeting Attendance

13 

Equity Holding Requirement for Directors

13 

Insider Trading Policy – Prohibited Trading Transactions

13 

Stockholder Communications with Directors

14

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

14 

BOARD COMMITTEES

15 

Corporate Governance Committee

15 

Corporate Governance Committee - Nomination Policies and Procedures

15 

Audit Committee

17 

Finance Committee

17 

Compensation Committee

17 

Compensation Committee – Interlocks and Insider Participation

18 

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE REPORT

18 

INFORMATION REGARDING OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

19 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

1520 

Executive Summary of Compensation Decisions and Results

1520 

Governance of Executive Officer Compensation Program 

1722 

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Framework

1723 

Executive Officer Compensation Decisions for Fiscal Year 20192022

1924 

Other Compensation Policies

28 

Accounting Considerations

2831 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT 

29 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

2932 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

2932 

Summary Compensation Table 

3032 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 20192022 

3234 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20192022 Fiscal Year End 

3335 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested - Fiscal Year 20192022

3335 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation – Fiscal Year 20192022

3436 

Supplemental Death Benefit Plans and Supplemental Insurance Benefits

3436 

Change of Control Severance Agreements

3436 

CEO Pay Ratio

3638 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

38 

AUDIT RELATED MATTERS

39 

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Accounting Firm

39 

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

39 

Related Party Transactions Review and Oversight

39 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

37 

ITEM NO.3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

38 

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Audit Fees

38 

Audit-Related Fees

38 

Tax Fees

38 

All Other Fees

3940 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR OUR 2023 ANNUAL MEETING

39 41 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

41 

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

42 




 

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY



We provide below highlights of certain information in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, please refer to the complete Proxy Statement and 20192022 Annual Report before you vote.





20192022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS





 

 

Date and Time: 

December 10, 2019,13, 2022,  at 2:10:00 p.m.a.m., Pacific Time

 

Record Date: 

October 15, 2019 17, 2022

 

Virtual Meeting Place:

WD-40 Company

9715 Businesspark Avenue 

San Diego, California 92131https://meetnow.global/M9Z7T5K

 

Meeting Webcast:

Available on the Company’s investor relations website at http:/investor.wd40company.com beginning at 2:10:00 p.m.a.m., Pacific Time on December 10, 201913, 2022



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Corporate Governance Policies Reflect Best PracticesVOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Annual election of all directors with majority voting requirement

Executive sessions of independent directors

held at each regularly scheduled board meeting

Governance guidelines for independent director leadership and best governance practices

Annual performance evaluations for board, committees and individual directors

Annual consideration of succession planning for the board, the CEO, and senior management

Company policy prohibits pledging and hedging

of WD-40 Company stock by directors

All non-employee directors are independent

All equity grants received by directors must be held until board service is ended

VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS



 

 

 

 

Management Proposals:

 

Board’s Recommendation

 

Page

Election of Directors (Item No. 1)

 

FOR all Director Nominees

 

34 



 

 

 

 

Advisory Vote Toto Approve Executive Compensation
(Item (“Say on Pay”) (Item No. 2)

 

FOR

 

148 



 

 

 

 

Ratification of Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 20202023 (Item No. 3)

 

FOR

 

38 


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND FRAMEWORK

Compensation Objectives

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to achieve five primary objectives:

1.Attract, motivate, reward and retain high performing executives;

2.Align the interests and compensation of executives with the value created for stockholders;

3.Create a sense of motivation among executives to achieve both short- and long-term Company objectives;

4.Create a direct, meaningful link between business and team performance and individual accomplishment and rewards; and

5.Ensure our compensation programs are appropriately competitive in the relevant labor markets.

Our Executive Compensation Programs Incorporate Strong Governance Features



 

 

 

No Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

Executive Officers are Subject to Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

No Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans for Executive Officers

Executives are Prohibited from Hedging or Pledging Company Stock

Long-Term Incentive Awards are Subject to Double-Trigger Vesting upon Change of Control

No Backdating or Re-pricing of Equity Awards

Annual and Long-Term Incentive Programs Provide a Balanced Mix of Goals for Profitability and Total Stockholder Return Performance

Financial Goals for Performance Awards Never Reset



Say-on-Pay VotingFAQS AND GENERAL INFORMATION

Since 2011,

Q:Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

A: This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the Company’ssolicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors has authorizedthe Company for use at its annual advisory votes formeeting to be held on Tuesday, December 13, 2022, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof.

At the stockholders to consider and approve the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement (“Say-On-Pay” votes).

In 2011, and again at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,annual meeting, the Company’s stockholders were askedwill consider and vote upon (i) the election of the Board for the ensuing year; (ii) an advisory vote to express their preferenceapprove compensation for named executive officers (“NEOs”);  and (iii) the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023. Detailed information concerning these matters is set forth below. Management knows of no other business to come before the annual meeting.

Q:When and where will the annual meeting be held?

A: In order to provide expanded access to our stockholders, this year’s annual meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders conducted exclusively via a live audio webcast, accessible at https://meetnow.global/M9Z7T5K. Although no physical in-person meeting will be held, we designed the format of this year’s annual meeting to ensure that our stockholders of record who attend the annual meeting will be afforded similar rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting.

The annual meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Tuesday, December 13, 2022. Online access to the frequency of Say-on-Pay votes. In each instance,audio webcast will open 15 minutes prior to the Company’s stockholders expressed a preference to have Say-on-Pay votes every year.

The Say-on-Pay votes approving NEO compensation for 2011 through 2018 have been approved in each year by more than 95%start of the votes cast.annual meeting. Stockholders are encouraged to access the annual meeting prior to the start time and allow ample time to log into the audio webcast and test their computer systems.

Please seeQ:How can I participate in the Compensation Discussionvirtual annual meeting?

A: The annual meeting will be conducted exclusively by live audio webcast and Analysis sectionutilize the latest technology to expand access, improve communication, and save costs for stockholders and the Company.  Anyone may enter the annual meeting as a guest in listen-only mode, but only stockholders as of this Proxy Statement for a detailed descriptionthe record date and holders of our executive compensation.


GENERAL INFORMATION

Q:

Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

A:

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of WD-40 Company for use at its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Tuesday, December 10, 2019, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof. This Proxy Statement and enclosed form of proxy are first sent to stockholders on or about October 31, 2019.

At the meeting, the stockholders of WD-40 Company will consider and vote upon (i) the election of the Board of Directors for the ensuing year; (ii) an advisory vote to approve executive compensation; and (iii) the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020. Detailed information concerning these matters is set forth below. Management knows of no other business to come before the meeting.

Q:

What constitutes a quorum in order to hold and transact business at the Annual Meeting?

A:

The close of business on October 15, 2019 is the record date for stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of WD-40 Company. On October 15, 2019, WD-40 Company had outstanding 13,704,661 shares of $.001 par value common stock. Stockholders of record entitled to vote at the meeting will have one vote for each share so held on the matters to be voted upon. If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” A majority of the outstanding shares will constitute a quorum at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Broker non-votes are shares that are held of record by a bank or broker as to which the bank or broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner as to how the shares are to be voted.

Q:

If I hold my shares through a broker, how do I vote?

A:

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. If you hold your shares through a broker, it is important that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors,  in the advisory vote to approve executive compensation, and for ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.  Your broker will only be permitted to exercise its discretionary authority to vote on your behalf as to the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’ independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.  You may have received a notice from the Company entitled “Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on December 10, 2019” with voting instructions or you may have received these proxy materials with separate voting instructions. Follow the instructions to vote or to request further voting instructions as set forth on the materials you have received. For more information on this topic, see the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Spotlight on Proxy Matters – The Mechanics of Voting at https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxymatters/voting_mechanics.shtml.

Q:

How will my vote be cast if I provide instructions or return my proxy and can I revoke my proxy?

A:

If the enclosed form of proxy is properly executed and returned, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the instructions specified thereon. If no specified instruction is given with respect to a particular matter on your form of proxy, your shares will be voted by the proxy holder as set forth on the form of proxy. A proxy may be revoked by attendance at the meeting or by filing a proxy bearing a later date with the Secretary of the Company.

Q:

How are the proxies solicited and what is the cost?

A:

The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. Solicitations other than by mail may be made by telephone or in person by employees of the Company for which the expense will be nominal.

valid proxies are entitled to vote or ask questions at the annual meeting. To participate in the annual meeting, you will need to review the information included on your notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

1

 


 

PRINCIPAL SECURITY HOLDERSStockholders of Record

TheIf you are a registered stockholder (that is, if you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to register to attend the annual meeting. You can participate in the annual meeting by accessing https://meetnow.global/M9Z7T5K.  You will be able to attend the annual meeting online, ask a question and vote by following table sets forth information concerning those persons knownthe instructions on your notice, proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you cannot locate your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card but would still like to attend the Companyannual meeting, you can join as a guest by selecting “I am a Guest.” Guest attendees will not be allowed to bevote or submit questions at the beneficial owners of more than 5%annual meeting. Stockholders are encouraged to vote and submit proxies in advance of the common stockannual meeting by internet, telephone or mail as early as possible.

Beneficial Owners

If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you have several options to participate in the annual meeting.

If you would like to attend the annual meeting and do not want to ask questions or vote you can simply join the annual meeting as a guest. You can participate in the annual meeting by accessing https://meetnow.global/M9Z7T5K.  Guest attendees will not be allowed to vote or submit questions at the annual meeting. Stockholders are encouraged to vote and submit proxies in advance of the Company:annual meeting by internet, telephone or mail as early as possible.



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
October 15, 2019

 

Percent of Class



 

 

 

 

Blackrock, Inc.

 

1,991,306 

1

14.53% 

55 East 52nd Street

 

 

 

 

New York, NY 10055

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Vanguard Group, Inc.

 

1,469,326 

2

10.72% 

P.O. Box 2600

 

 

 

 

Valley Forge, PA 19482

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Neuberger Berman Group LLC

 

748,758 

3

5.46% 

1290 Avenue of the Americas

 

 

 

 

New York, NY 10104

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

If you are a beneficial owner and want to attend the annual meeting, ask a question and/or vote, you have two options: 

1

As1)Most beneficial holders do not need to register in advance and will be able to fully participate using the control number received with their voting instruction form. Please note, however, that this option may not be available for every type of June 30, 2019, BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) filedbeneficial owner voting control number. The absence of this option shall not impact the validity of the annual meeting. Most beneficial holders can participate in the annual meeting by accessing https://meetnow.global/M9Z7T5K,  which enables them to attend the annual meeting online, ask a reportquestion and vote by following the instructions on Form 13F with the Securities and Exchange Commission to report beneficial ownership of a total of 1,991,306 shares managed by eleven BlackRock investment management subsidiaries. BlackRock disclaims investment discretion with respect to all shares reported as beneficially owned by its investment management subsidiaries. BlackRock Fund Advisors holds sole investment discretion and sole voting authority with respect to 1,471,864 shares. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. reported sole investment discretion and sole voting authority with respect to 374,255 shares and sole investment discretion and no voting authority with respect to 18,448 shares. Sole investment discretion and sole voting authority with respect to shares is reported fornotice, proxy card, or on the following BlackRock subsidiaries: BlackRock Investment Management, LLC as to 60,337 shares; BlackRock Advisors LLC as to 23,473 shares; BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited as to 20,410 shares; and four other BlackRock subsidiaries as to a total of 3,669 shares. BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. reported sole investment discretion and sole voting authority with respect to 564 shares and sole investment discretion and no voting authority with respect to 11,547 shares. BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited reported sole investment discretion and sole voting authority with respect to 3,222 shares and sole investment discretion and no voting authority with respect to 3,517 shares. Beneficial ownership information for BlackRock, Inc. and its investment management subsidiaries as of October 15, 2019 is unavailable.instructions that accompanied the proxy materials.

2

As2)Beneficial owners may choose to register in advance of June 30, 2019, Vanguard Group Inc. (“Vanguard”) filed a reportthe annual meeting if they prefer to use this traditional, paper-based option. To register to participate in the annual meeting, submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your WD-40 Company (WDFC) holdings, along with your name and email address to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Form 13F withDecember 9, 2022, using one of the Securities and Exchange Commission to report beneficial ownership of 1,469,326 shares, including 28,511 shares held by Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co. and 3,800 shares held by Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd.  Vanguard reported sole investment discretion and no voting authority with respect to 1,435,404 shares and sole investment discretion and sole voting authority with respect to 1,611 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co. reported shared investment discretion and sole voting authority with respect to all 28,511 shares and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. reported shared investment and shared voting authority with respect to all 3,800 shares. Beneficial ownership information as of October 15, 2019 is unavailable.

3

As of June 30, 2019, Neuberger Berman Group LLC (“Neuberger”) filed a report on Form 13F with the Securities and Exchange Commission to report beneficial ownership of 748,758 shares. Neuberger reported shared investment discretion with respect to all shares, sole voting authority with respect to 742,963 shares and no voting authority with respect to 5,795 shares. Beneficial ownership information as of October 15, 2019 is unavailable.following methods:

Email: Forward the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com.

Mail: Send a copy of the email or correspondence from your broker, or include your legal proxy, to WD-40 Company Legal Proxy, P.O. Box 43001, Providence, RI 02940-3001.

Upon receipt of your valid legal proxy, Computershare will provide you with a control number by email. Once provided, you can attend and participate in the annual meeting by accessing https://meetnow.global/M9Z7T5K. Enter the control number provided by Computershare.

Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy using the methods described the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials sent to you, or by following the instructions at www.envisionreports.com/WDFC.

Our annual meeting procedures are intended to authenticate stockholders’ identities, allow stockholders to give their voting instructions, confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly, and comport with applicable legal requirements.



Q:What constitutes a quorum in order to hold and transact business at the annual meeting?



A: The close of business on October 17, 2022 is the record date for stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. On the record date,  the Company had 13,579,926 shares of $0.001 par value common stock outstanding. Stockholders of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting will have one vote for each share so held on the matters to be voted upon. If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” A majority of the outstanding shares will constitute a quorum at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Broker non-votes are shares that are held of record by a bank or broker as to which the bank or broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner as to how the shares are to be voted.

2

 


 

Q:If I hold my shares through a broker, how do I vote?

A: If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. It is important that you cast your vote if you want it to count in (i) the election of directors, (ii) the advisory vote to approve executive compensation, and (iii) the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023. Your broker will only be permitted to exercise its discretionary authority to vote on your behalf as to the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. You may have received a notice from the Company entitled “Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” with voting instructions or you may have received these proxy materials with separate voting instructions. Follow the instructions to vote or to request further voting instructions as set forth on the proxy materials you have received.

Q:How will my vote be cast if I provide instructions or return my proxy and can I revoke my proxy?

A: If the enclosed form of proxy is properly executed and returned, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the instructions specified thereon. If no specified instruction is given with respect to a particular matter on your proxy, your shares will be voted by the proxy holder as set forth on your proxy. A proxy may be revoked by attendance at the annual meeting or by filing a proxy bearing a later date with the Corporate Secretary of the Company.

Q:How are the proxies solicited and what is the cost?

A: The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. Solicitations other than by mail may be made by telephone or in person by employees of the Company for which the expense will be nominal. We may also reimburse persons

representing beneficial owners for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding such materials.

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies. A number of banks and brokers with account holders that are our stockholders will be householding our proxy materials. A single Proxy Statement will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. If you have received notice from your bank or broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate Proxy Statement and Annual Report, please notify your bank or broker, direct your written request to investorrelations@wd40.com, Investor Relations, 9715 Businesspark Ave., San Diego, CA 92131 or contact Investor Relations by telephone at +1  (800)  448-9340. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Proxy Statement at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their bank or broker.

3


PROPOSALS

ITEM NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS

AND SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT



At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders,2022 annual meeting, the tentwelve nominees named below under the heading, DirectorNominees for Election as Directors, will be presented for election as directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and untilannual meeting when their successors aremay be elected or appointed. In the event any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting,annual meeting, any proxy granted to vote for such nominee will be voted for a nominee designated by the present Board of Directors to fill such vacancy.



A nominee for election to the Board of Directors will be elected as a director if the votes cast for such nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against such nominee’s election. Holders of common stock are not entitled to cumulate their votes in the election of directors. Withheld votes and broker non-votes are not counted as votes in favor of any nominee.



If an incumbent director nominee fails to receive more votes for his or her election as a director than votes against his or her election, the incumbent director will continue to serve as a director until his or hera successor is elected or appointed. However, pursuant to governance guidelinesCorporate Governance Guidelines adopted by the Board, of Directors, such director nominee will be expected to tender his or her resignation to the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors.Board. The Corporate Governance Committee will promptly consider such resignation and present a recommendation to the Board of Directors concerning the acceptanceto accept or rejection ofreject such resignation for formal action to be taken within 90 days following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.annual meeting.  



Article III, Section 3.2 of the Bylaws of the Company most recently amended(amended and restated on August 15, 2018,2018) provides that the authorized number of directors of the Company shall not be less than seven nor more than twelve until changed by amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation or by a bylaw duly adopted by the stockholders. The exact number of directors is to be fixed from time to time by a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors or by the stockholders.

By resolution of the Board of Directors adopted on March 18, 2019,June 20, 2022,  the number of directors was fixed at ten. Linda A. Lang is retiring fromtwelve, effective immediately. On such date, the Board of Directorsappointed Edward O. Magee, Jr. as of the date of the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. On June 18, 2019, Trevor I. Mihalik was nominated by the Board of Directors for election12th director and voted to include Cynthia B. Burks as a director nominee to be elected at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Company’s 2022 annual meeting.    



DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCEAfter 35 years of service to the Company, 25 years of which included service on the Board as its Executive Chair, Garry O. Ridge provided notice to the Company in March 2022 that he will retire as CEO effective August 31, 2022, and that he will not stand for re-election. He will serve the remainder of his current term and retire as Chair of the Board immediately following the 2022 annual meeting in accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.



DIRECTOR NOMINEES

1

Director Nominees

Independent1

Audit

Compensation

Corporate
Governance

Finance

Steven A. Brass

Cynthia B. Burks2

Daniel T. Carter

Chair3

Melissa Claassen

Eric P. Etchart

Chair

Lara L. Lee

Edward O. Magee, Jr.

Trevor I. Mihalik

Chair

Graciela I. Monteagudo

David B. Pendarvis

Gregory A. Sandfort

Anne G. Saunders

Chair

1The Board of Directors has determined that each director and nominee other than Garry O. Ridge is an independent director as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the “Nasdaq Rules”). In considering the independence of directors, the Board of Directors considered Gregory A. Sandfort’s indirect interest, as an executive officer of Tractor Supply Company, in purchases of the Company’s products made by Tractor Supply Company in the ordinary course of business. The Company has concluded that(except for Mr. Sandfort’s indirect interest in such transactions is not material and does not require specific disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

Information concerning the independence of directors serving on committees of the Board of Directors is provided below as to each committee.

3


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following tables set forth certain information, including beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock, for the current directors and director nominees, for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and for all directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
October 15, 20191

Director/Nominee

 

Age

 

Principal Occupation

 

Director
Since

 

Number

 

Percent of
Class

Daniel T. Carter

 

63

 

Investor, Former CFO, BevMo! Inc.

 

2016

 

3,346 

2

*

Melissa Claassen

 

47

 

Vice President Finance, Emerging Markets, adidas Group

 

2015

 

4,209 

3

*

Eric P. Etchart

 

63

 

Investor, Former Senior Vice President,
The Manitowoc Company

 

2016

 

3,500 

4

*

Linda A. Lang
(retiring director)

 

61

 

Board Chair, WD-40 Company; Investor, Former Chairman & CEO, Jack in the Box, Inc.

 

2004

 

20,008 

5

*

Trevor I. Mihalik
(nominee director)

 

53

 

Executive Vice President and CFO, Sempra Energy

 

N/A

 

300 

 

*

David B. Pendarvis

 

60

 

Chief Administrative Officer, Global General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, ResMed Inc.

 

2017

 

1,668 

6

*

Daniel E. Pittard

 

69

 

Investor, Former President and CEO,
Rubio's Restaurants, Inc.

 

2016

 

3,791 

7

*

Garry O. Ridge

 

63

 

CEO, WD-40 Company

 

1997

 

94,392 

8

*

Gregory A. Sandfort

 

64

 

CEO, Tractor Supply Company

 

2011

 

16,290 

9

*

Anne G. Saunders

 

58

 

Investor, Former President, U.S., nakedwines.com

 

2019

 

405 

10

*

Neal E. Schmale

 

73

 

Investor, Former President and COO, Sempra Energy

 

2001

 

27,614 

11

*



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Less than one (1) percent.Brass):

1(i)

All shares ownedhas no material relationship with the Company (either directly unless otherwise indicated.or indirectly through an immediate family member or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company), and

2(ii)

Mr. Carter hasis an independent director as defined in the right to receive 3,346 shares upon settlementMarketplace Rules of vested restricted stock units upon termination of his service as a director of the Company.

3

Ms. Claassen has the right to receive 4,209 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of her service as a director of the Company.

4

Mr. Etchart has the right to receive 2,500 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of his service as a director of the Company.

5

Ms. Lang has the right to receive 16,366 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of her service as a director of the Company.

6

Mr. Pendarvis has the right to receive 1,668 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of his service as a director of the Company.

7

Mr. Pittard has the right to receive 1,966 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of his service as a director of the Company.

8

Mr. Ridge has the right to receive 5,884 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of employment, the right to receive 967 shares upon settlement of vested deferred performance units upon termination of employment, the right to receive 4,223 shares upon settlement of restricted stock units upon vesting within 60 days, and the right to receive 8,500 shares within 60 days upon settlement of vested market share units. Mr. Ridge also has voting and investment power over 1,274 shares held under the Company’s 401(k) plan.

9

Mr. Sandfort has the right to receive 10,936 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of his service as a director of the Company.

10

Ms. Saunders has the right to receive 405 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of her service as a director of the Company.

11

Mr. Schmale has the right to receive 16,847 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of his service as a director of the Company.The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the “Nasdaq Rules”).

2If elected, the Board will determine Ms. Burks’ assignment to committees shortly after the 2022 annual meeting concludes.

3The Board determined that Mr. Carter is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by regulations adopted by the SEC.



4

 


 

STEVEN A. BRASS – CEO, President and Director



SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (cont’d)Steven A. Brass, age 56 was appointed to the Board in March 2022. Mr. Brass was appointed CEO, effective September 2022 and continues to serve as President, a position that he has held since 2019. He joined the Company in 1991 as International Area Manager at the Company’s U.K. subsidiary and has since held several management positions including Country Manager in Germany, Director of Continental Europe, European Sales Director, and European Commercial Director. From 2016 until 2019, Mr. Brass served as Division President, The Americas, and from 2019 to August 2022, as Chief Operating Officer. As CEO and President of the Company, Mr. Brass offers the Board a broad and deep Company-based perspective. In addition, his specific knowledge of the Company’s operations, coupled with his breadth of experience with international markets and our domestic market, provides the Board with valuable insight. 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
October 15, 2019 1

Executive Officer

 

Age

 

Principal Occupation

 

 

 

Number

 

Percent of
Class

Jay W. Rembolt

 

68

 

Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and CFO,
WD-40 Company

 

40,428 

2

*

Steven A. Brass

 

53

 

President and COO, WD-40 Company

 

5,077 

3

*

Richard T. Clampitt

 

64

 

Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary,
WD-40 Company

 

7,438 

4

*

William B. Noble

 

61

 

Managing Director, EMEA, WD-40 Company Limited

 

9,829 

5

*

All Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers as a Group

 

256,343 

6

1.86%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CYNTHIA B. BURKS – Independent Director Nominee

*Less than one (1) percent.

1

All shares owned directly unless otherwise indicated.

2

Mr. Rembolt has the right to receive 310 shares upon settlement of vested deferred performance units upon termination of employment, the right to receive 810 shares upon settlement of restricted stock units upon vesting within 60 days, and the right to receive 1,564 shares within 60 days upon settlement of vested market share units. Mr. Rembolt also has voting and investment power over 6,456 shares held under the Company’s 401(k) plan.

3

Mr. Brass has the right to receive 108 shares upon settlement of vested deferred performance units upon termination of employment, the right to receive 753 shares upon settlement of restricted stock units upon vesting within 60 days, and the right to receive 1,175 shares within 60 days upon settlement of vested market share units.

4

Mr. Clampitt has the right to receive 179 shares upon settlement of vested deferred performance units upon termination of employment, the right to receive 598 shares upon settlement of restricted stock units upon vesting within 60 days, and the right to receive 1,342 shares within 60 days upon settlement of vested market share units.  

5

 Mr. Noble has the right to receive 3,971 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of employment, the right to receive 280 shares upon settlement of vested deferred performance units upon termination of employment, the right to receive 487 shares upon settlement of restricted stock units upon vesting within 60 days, and the right to receive 984 shares within 60 days upon settlement of vested market share units.

6

Total includes the rights of executive officers and directors to receive a total of 72,069 shares upon settlement of vested restricted stock units upon termination of employment or service as a director of the Company, the rights of executive officers to receive 2,371 shares upon settlement of vested deferred performance units upon termination of employment, the rights of executive officers to receive a total of 8,223 shares upon settlement of restricted stock units upon vesting within 60 days, the rights of executive officers to receive a total of 16,145 shares within 60 days upon settlement of vested market share units, and a total of 8,768 shares held by executive officers under the Company’s 401(k) plan.  

5


NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS Cynthia B. Burks, age 56, serves as a director and member of the Organization and Compensation Committee of Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (NYSE: INSP), which she joined in August 2022.  In addition, she serves as a board member of two privately held companies:  Torch, an educational software company, and Sellars Absorbent Materials, Inc., a manufacturer of absorbents made with recycled fibers, since January 2022 and August 2022, respectively. Ms. Burks also serves on the board of two non-profit organizations: Juma Ventures, which strives to break the cycle of youth poverty, and Summer Search, which mentors and develops youths, since December 2021 and June 2021, respectively.  Ms. Burks’ board experience includes serving the Genentech Foundation from 2020 to 2022.  From 2019 to 2022, Ms. Burks was a senior vice president and chief people and culture officer at Genentech, Inc., a subsidiary of Roche Holding AG (OTCQX: RHHBY). She served as vice president, head of human resources at Genentech Research and Early Development from 2015 to 2019, and in various human resource management roles at Genentech from 2011 to 2015. From 1999 to 2011, Ms. Burks held human resource and organizational development positions in industries including media, consumer goods and technology. Ms. Burks extensive knowledge of human capital strategy including talent management, succession planning, compensation strategy, designing culture to increase competitive advantage, diversity, equity and inclusion, and organizational design would enhance the Board’s management oversight capabilities.



DANIEL T. CARTER – Independent Director

Daniel T. Carter, age 66, was elected to the Board in 2016 and serves as the Chair of Directors in 2016.the Audit Committee and as a member of the Finance Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Carter served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of BevMo! Inc. from 2009 until June 2016. Mr. Carter served as chief financial officer of Semtek, Inc. from 2008 to 2009; chief financial officer at Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. from 1998 to 2007; and chief financial officer of Advanced Marketing Services from 1997 to 1998. From 1986 to 1997, he was employed by Price Club and its follow-on entities, serving as senior vice president for PriceCostco and chief financial officer for Price Enterprises. Mr. Carter began his career as an auditor with Ernst & Young, and he is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive). Mr. Carter received his Bachelor of Business Administration degree in accounting from the University of Oklahoma. Mr. Carter is recognized as a NACD Board Leadership Fellow and has earned Harvard’s Corporate Director Certificate. Mr. Carter’s financial expertise, considerable knowledge of the retail industry and non-profit company boardfinancial experience provideprovides the Board with a breadth of relevant skills and experience.



Skills and Expertise:

·

Former CFO with extensive finance and accounting expertise 

·

In-depth knowledge of retail industry

·

Considerable non-profit board experience

Committees:

·

Audit (Chair)

·

Finance

MELISSA CLAASSEN –  Independent Director


Melissa Claassen, age 50, was elected to the Board in 2015 and serves as a member of Directors in 2015.the Compensation Committee and the Finance Committee. Ms. Claassen is vice president finance, emerging markets – adidas Group.Group (XETR: ADS). She served as vice president, brand finance at adidas from 2018 to 2019 and as vice president, business unit finance at adidas from 2015 to 2018.  Ms. Claassen served as the chief financial officer of Taylor Made – adidas Golf from 2012 to 2015. From 1996 until 2012, Ms. Claassen held positions at various adidas subsidiaries including chief financial officer of adidas Group Hong Kong and Taiwan, controlling director at adidas Group China, head of marketing controlling, senior financial controller, finance manager, SAP team lead, management accountant, and financial accountant. Ms. Claassen’s extensive knowledge and expertise in the areas of collaboration, finance, accounting, and international business enhance the Board’s management oversight capabilities.  



Skills and Expertise:

·

International business experience

·

Finance and accounting expertise 

Committees:

·

Finance (Chair)

·

Compensation

ERIC P. ETCHART – Independent Director


Eric P. Etchart, age 65, was elected to the Board in 2016 and serves as the Chair of Directors in 2016.the Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of the Finance Committee. Mr. Etchart served as senior vice president of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. from 2007 until his retirement in January 2016. He served as senior vice president, business development, from 2015 to 2016 and as president and general manager of the Manitowoc Crane Group from 2007 to 2015. From 1983 to 2007, Mr. Etchart held various sales, marketing and management positions at subsidiaries and predecessor companies of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. Mr. Etchart is a French national, having held management positions in China, Singapore, Italy, France and the United States.U. S. Mr. Etchart is recognized as a NACD Board Leadership Fellow.Fellow and recently earned Diligent Climate Leadership Certification, which focuses on climate risk and related business strategy, board-related fiduciary obligations, climate-related government regulations, reporting and disclosure requirements, and investor engagement. He presently serves as a director and as a member of the Audit Committee and the Governance Committee of Graco Inc. (NYSE: GGG) and as a director and member of the Compensation Committee and the Chair of the Nominating / Corporate Governance Committee of Alamo Group Inc. (NYSE: ALG). In addition, Mr. Etchart

5


serves as a director of the UPERIO Group, which sells and rents tower and self-erecting cranes, and chairs its Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Committee. Mr. Etchart’s breadth of international finance, marketing, board and management experience provides important perspective to the Board. His demonstrated commitment to the highest standards of board leadership, strengthenswith an emphasis on ESG, demonstrates the Board’s continued commitment to good governance.   



SkillsLARA L. LEE – Independent Director

Lara L. Lee, age 59, was elected to the Board in 2020 and Expertise:serves as a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee.  Ms. Lee operates Lara Lee Associates, LLC dba Creative Renewal, which offers governance, consulting, and advisory services. Previously, Ms. Lee served as president of Orchard Supply Hardware, a subsidiary of Lowe’s Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW), from 2016 to 2018 and as senior vice president of Lowe’s from 2013 to 2018. From 2011 to 2013 she served as chief innovation and operating officer for Continuum, a global consultancy. She was also a partner at an innovation firm, Jump Associates, from 2007 to 2010. Ms. Lee’s prior experience included 15 years at Harley-Davidson Motor Company as vice president, business unit leader, and in various European and Asian strategy and business development roles, and three years as a financial analyst at Otis Elevator Company based in Singapore. Ms. Lee is NACD Directorship Certified and previously served as a director of Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. (NASDAQ: MBII) and the board’s designated ESG liaison to management.  In addition to serving as a director of two non-profit organizations, Ms. Lee serves as a director of The Sill, Inc, an omnichannel specialty retailer of house plants and related products, and as a director of the parent company of Liberty Safe & Security Products, Inc., which designs and manufactures residential safes.  She began her career with Ernst & Whinney (now Ernst & Young LLP) in Washington, D.C. and Singapore. Ms. Lee’s diverse international business and management experience, including expertise in strategic marketing (including digital, e-commerce and channel marketing), brand development, and innovation across industries and international markets, will provide the Board with valuable insights.

·

Strong management background in sales, marketing and finance

·

International business experience

·

Board governance 



Committees:

·

Corporate Governance (Chair)

·

Finance

EDWARD O. MAGEE, JR. – Independent Director

Edward O. Magee, Jr., age 56, was appointed to the Board in June 2022 and serves as a member of the Audit Committee and the Finance Committee. Since February 2020, Mr. Magee has served as executive vice president, operations at Fender Musical Instruments Corporation (“Fender”), a privately held musical instruments company owned by Servco Pacific Inc. Prior to his current role, he served as senior vice president, operations at Fender from 2016 to 2020. Mr. Magee served as vice president of operations and distribution for Thomas & Betts Corporation (presently ABB Installation Products Inc.) (NYSE: ABB) from 2014 to 2016 and in various management roles in vehicle operations at Harley-Davidson Motor Company from 2009 to 2014. Prior to his executive experience, Mr. Magee served as a combat-decorated Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Marine Corps. He has extensive non-profit board experience including the Board of Visitors at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business, the Fender Play Foundation™, Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro LA, and an advisory role for the National Association of Manufacturers, “Heroes MAKE America” veterans transition program. Mr. Magee’s extensive knowledge of manufacturing, sustainability, supply chain, and logistics as well as his wide-ranging experience building and developing global leadership teams that drive organizational culture change enhance the Board’s management oversight capabilities.

6




TREVOR I. MIHALIK –  Independent Director Nominee

Trevor I. Mihalik, age 56, was elected to the Board in 2019 and serves as the Chair of the Finance Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Mihalik has served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of Sempra Energy (NYSE: SRE) (“Sempra”) since May 2018. Mr. Mihalik was senior vice president controller and chief accounting officer of Sempra Energy from 2014 until 2018 and controller and chief accounting officer from 2012 to 2014. Prior to Sempra, Energy, Mr. Mihalik held roles as senior vice president – finance for Iberdrola Renewables and vice president and CFO for Chevron Natural Gas.  Mr. Mihalik’s current experienceMihalik previously served as director of SDG&ESan Diego Gas & Electric Company and SoCalGas as well as past experienceSouthern California Gas Company, as chairman of the board of Luz del Sur and Chilquinta Energia, and as a director of Infraestructura Energética Nova S.A.B. de C.V., all currently or formerly owned and controlled Sempra subsidiaries. Mr. Mihalik’s currently serves as a  director of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, a Sempra subsidiary. Mr. Mihalik’s involvement with significant transactions in addition to his extensive senior management experience with Fortune 500 companies as a seasoned finance executive with accounting and public company financial reporting expertise, and as a director with experience in the oversight of business management and strategic planning, offers the Board valuable judgment and management perspective.



GRACIELA I. MONTEAGUDO –  Independent Director

SkillsGraciela I. Monteagudo, age 56, was elected to the Board in 2020 and Expertiseserves as a member of the Audit Committee and the Finance Committee:. Ms. Monteagudo served as president and CEO of Lala U.S., Inc. from 2017 to 2018. From 2015 to 2017 she served as president, Americas and global marketing for Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and from 2012 to 2015 she held various leadership roles at Mead Johnson & Company, LLC. From 2008 through 2012, she held various leadership roles at Walmart Mexico, including senior vice president and business unit head for Sam’s Club stores in Mexico. Ms. Monteagudo has dual Mexican and American citizenship and has held senior management positions in both Latin America and the U. S. Ms. Monteagudo is recognized as a NACD Board Leadership Fellow and she has been included in the Women Inc. Magazine Most Influential Corporate Directors list. Ms. Monteagudo presently serves as a director of ACCO Brands Corporation (NYSE: ACCO)

6

·

Seasoned finance executive with accounting and public company financial reporting expertise

·

Directorship experience for oversight of business management and strategic planning

·

Significant transactions experience


 

Committeesand iHeartMedia, Inc. (NASDAQ: IHRT). Ms. Monteagudo’s significant board and leadership experience, including international business experience in Latin America, her extensive global,  digital, and retail marketing, e-commerce and consumer :goods expertise offers the Board with valuable marketing and consumer products insight. 

·

To be determined upon election to the Board



DAVID B. PENDARVIS –  Independent Director

David B. Pendarvis, age 63, was elected to the Board in 2017 and serves as a member of Directors in 2017.the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. Mr. Pendarvis has served as chief administrative officer of ResMed Inc. (“ResMed,” NYSE and ASX: RMD) since 2011.  From March through July2011 and secretary since 2003.  He also serves as a member of the board of directors of ResMed’s subsidiaries and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce.  In 2017, he served as interim president, EMEA and Japan of ResMed Inc.ResMed. He joined ResMed Inc. in 2002 as global general counsel and he has served as secretary since 2003 and he also served as vice president of organizational development from 2005 to 2011. From 2000 until 2002Before joining ResMed, Mr. Pendarvis was a partner at Gray Cary Ware & FriedenrichFreidenrich LLP (presently, DLA Piper). From 1986 until 2000 he was an associate (1986-1992) and, a partner (1993-2000) at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, and from 1984 until 1986 he served as a law clerk to United StatesU.S. District Court Judge, J.Lawrence Irving in the United StatesU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego. Mr. Pendarvis served as a director of Sequenom, Inc. from 2009 until its acquisition by Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (NYSE: LH) in 2016. His expertise in corporate governance, compliance, intellectual property and worldwide legal expertiseaffairs, and experience as general counsel with global responsibilities, providesincluding international executive management experience and focus on investor relations and corporate communications, provide the Board of Directors with valuable perspective for risk oversight.

Skills and Expertise:

·

In depth experience in corporate governance,  compliance, intellectual property and world-wide legal affairs

·

Strong focus on investor relations and corporate communications

·

International executive management experience

Committees:

·

Compensation

·

Corporate Governance

DANIEL E. PITTARD –  Director

Daniel E. Pittard was elected to the Board of Directors in 2016. From 2006 until his retirement in 2012, Mr. Pittard served as president, CEO and Board member of Rubio’s Restaurants, Inc. Mr. Pittard was an angel investor and served on the board of directors of five private companies from 2000 until 2005. He served as senior vice president, strategy and business development for Gateway, Inc. from 1998 until 1999; and group vice president, Amoco Company (now BP) from 1995 until 1998 with full P&L responsibilities for four businesses with $13 billion in revenue. As a senior vice president for PepsiCo/Frito-Lay from 1992 to 1995 he had responsibilities for international operations, strategy and new ventures. From 1980 to 1992 he was with McKinsey and Company, and served as a partner in Atlanta, Stockholm and Helsinki. From 1976 until 1980 Mr. Pittard was CEO of a joint venture in Saudi Arabia. Mr. Pittard has served on three public company boards - Rubio’s Restaurants, Novatel Wireless and Pulse Electronics - as well as many private and non-profit boards. He is a former public company CEO and McKinsey partner with considerable international experience. He  is also recognized as a NACD Board Leadership Fellow. His expertise in the areas of strategy development and international business and his extensive public and private company board experience provide the Board with valuable perspective.

Skills and Expertise:

·

Significant experience in consumer products and industrial business

·

Strong background in strategy development

·

International business experience

Committees:

·

Audit

·

Corporate Governance

7


GARRY O. RIDGE – CEO

Garry O. Ridge presently serves as CEO. He joined WD-40 Company in 1987 as managing director, WD-40 Company (Australia) Pty. Limited and he was responsible for Company operations throughout the Pacific and Asia. Mr. Ridge transferred to the corporate office in 1994 as director international operations and was elected vice president - international in 1995. He was elected to the position of executive vice president/chief operating officer in 1996. He was elected to the Board of Directors in 1997 and served as president and CEO from 1997 through June 2019. Prior to joining WD-40 Company Mr. Ridge was managing director of Mermax Pacific Pty. Ltd. and held a number of senior management positions with Hawker Pacific Pty. Ltd. (a Hawker Siddeley PLC Group Company) which was a licensee for WD-40® products until 1988. As the CEO of the Company, Mr. Ridge offers the Board an important Company-based perspective. In addition, his particular knowledge of the Company’s international markets and industry position provides the Board with valuable insight.

Skills and Expertise:

·

CEO of the Company

·

Leader with a passion for a strong culture, employee engagement and protecting and maximizing the return on the Company’s brand assets

·

Particular expertise in driving a global business



GREGORY A. SANDFORT –  Lead Independent Director

Gregory A. Sandfort, age 67, was elected to the Board in 2011 and serves as a member of DirectorsCompensation Committee, Corporate Governance Committee, and Finance Committee.  He was designated as lead independent director in 2011.October 2020. Mr. Sandfort has served as chief executive officer of Tractor Supply Company since(“TSC”), which is a distribution channel of the Company’s products, from December 2012.  He held the office of president of Tractor Supply Company from 2009 through 2015. Prior to 2013,  Mr. Sandfort2012 until his retirement in February 2020. At TSC, he  also served as president andfrom 2009 to 2015,  chief operating officer starting in 2012, and as president and  chief merchandising officer from 20092007 to 2012. Mr. Sandfort served as2012, and executive vice president-chief merchandising officer of Tractor Supply Companypresident from 2007 until he was promoted to president in 2009. Mr. Sandfort previously served as president and chief operating officer at Michael’s Stores, Inc. (“Michaels”) from 2006 to 2007, and as executive vice president-general merchandise manager at Michaels Stores, Inc. from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Sandfort presentlyalso serves as athe lead independent director on the board of Tractor Supply Company. Hedirectors of Genesco Inc. (NYSE: GCO), and he is recognized as aan NACD Board Leadership Fellow. Mr. Sandfort bringsAs a retail industry perspective toformer chief executive officer of TSC with a long-standing connection with consumers of the Board. TheCompany’s products, the Board also values Mr. Sandfort’s extensive management experience in, and perspective of, the retail industry.

Skills and Expertise:

·

Active CEO in a channel that distributes the Company’s products

·

Brings a retail industry perspective

·

Direct connection with consumers of the Company’s products

Committees:

·

Compensation (Chair)

·

Finance



aNNE g. sAUNDERS –  Independent Director

Anne G. Saunders, age 61, was elected to the Board in 2019 and serves as the Chair of Directors in March 2019.the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. Saunders served as president, U.S., of nakedwines.com from 2016 through 2017. From 2014 through 2016, she was president, U.S. of FTD Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ:  FTD), and from 2012 through 2014, she served as president of Redbox Automated Retail, LLC. From 1990 to 2012, Ms. Saunders held various senior executive level positions at Starbucks Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Knowledge Universe (now known as(presently KinderCare Education), eSociety and AT&T. Ms. Saunders is a director of Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee Inc. (TSX: SWP) and chairs its Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee and is the chair of the board of directors of Nautilus, Inc. (NYSE: NLS). Ms. Saunders’ functional expertise in brand management leadershipin significant consumer and retail markets,  diverse marketing strategy utilizing digital and e-commerce tools,  and product innovation and development as well as her extensive public company board experience, provide valuable experience to the Board. 



Skills and Expertise:There are no pending litigation or proceedings involving the Company’s directors or nominees.

·

Significant consumer and retail markets experience

·

Diverse digital and e-commerce marketing expertise

·

Product innovation and development experience  



THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES SET FORTH ABOVE.

Committees:7


ITEM NO. 2

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(“SAY-ON-PAY”)

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company’s stockholders are being asked to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) identified in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section of this Proxy Statement. This vote is commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote.

At the Company’s 2011 annual meeting and 2017 annual meeting, the Company’s stockholders were asked, by a non-binding advisory vote, to express their preference as to the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes. The Board recommended annual Say-on-Pay voting, and the Company’s stockholders approved to have Say-on-Pay votes every year. 

Since 2011, the Board has authorized annual advisory votes for the stockholders to consider and approve the compensation of the NEOs. The Say-on-Pay votes approving NEO compensation for 2011 through 2021 have been approved in each year by more than 83% of the votes cast.

The following resolution will be presented for approval by the Company’s stockholders at the 2022 annual meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of WD-40 Company (the “Company”) hereby approve the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and in the accompanying compensation tables and narrative disclosures.”

The advisory vote to approve executive compensation is a non-binding vote on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs. This Proxy Statement contains a description of the compensation provided to the NEOs as required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act.

Stockholders are encouraged to carefully consider the CD&A, accompanying compensation tables and related narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement in considering this advisory vote. The Board believes that the compensation provided to the Company’s NEOs offers a competitive pay package with a proper balance of current and long-term incentives aligned with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.

This is an advisory vote and will not affect compensation previously paid or awarded to the NEOs. While a vote disapproving the NEOs’ executive compensation will not be binding on the Board or the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee will consider the results of the advisory vote in making future executive compensation decisions.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the annual meeting is required to approve this advisory vote on executive compensation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

·

Audit

·

Corporate Governance

8

 


 

ITEM NO. 3

Neal E. Schmale RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the independent registered public accounting firm (“auditor”) for the Company to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for fiscal year 2023. Although ratification by stockholders is not required by law, the Audit Committee has determined that it is desirable to request ratification of this selection by the stockholders. Notwithstanding its selection, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a new auditor at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PwC, the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection.

A majority of the votes of the common stock present or represented at the annual meeting is required for approval. Broker non-votes will be voted in favor of approval. PwC acted as the Company’s auditor during the past fiscal year and, unless the Audit Committee appoints a  new auditor,  PwC will continue to act in such capacity during the current fiscal year. It is anticipated that a representative of PwC will attend the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PWC AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING AUGUST 31, 2023.

–  Director9


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

Neal E. Schmale was elected

The following table sets forth information concerning those stockholders known to the BoardCompany to be the beneficial owners of Directors in 2001. He servedmore than 5% of the common stock of the Company and, based on information furnished by them, such stockholders have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares, except as Board Chair from 2004 through 2016. Mr. Schmale was president and chief operating officerotherwise noted:



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial Ownership^

 

Percent of Class†



 

 

 

 

BlackRock, Inc.

 

2,126,258 

1

15.66% 

55 East 52nd Street

 

 

 

 

New York, NY 10055

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

APG Asset Management N.V.

 

1,642,584 

2

12.10% 

Gustav Mahlerplein 3, 1082 MS

 

 

 

 

Amsterdam, P7 00000  Netherlands

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Vanguard Group, Inc.

 

1,612,323 

3

11.87% 

P.O. Box 2600

 

 

 

 

Valley Forge, PA 19482

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Neuberger Berman Group LLC

 

883,726 

4

6.51% 

1290 Avenue of the Americas

 

 

 

 

New York, NY 10104

 

 

 

 

^Beneficial ownership information is based on reports as of Sempra Energy from 2006 until his retirement in 2011. Previously, he was executive vice president and chief financial officerJune 30, 2022 filed on Form 13F with the SEC. Such information is unavailable as of Sempra Energy from 1998 through 2005. Mr. Schmale served as a director of Sempra Energy from 2004 until 2011. He presently serves as a director of Murphy Oil Corporation. Mr. Schmale’s past experience as director on four public company boards and his extensive senior management experience with a Fortune 300 company offers the Board valuable judgment and management perspective.October 17, 2022.



Skills and Expertise:Based on13,579,926 shares of common stock outstanding as of the close of business on October 17, 2022.

·1

Former COOBlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) reported that these shares are managed by 15 investment management subsidiaries and CFOdisclaims investment discretion over such shares. A summary of investment discretion and voting authority of shares reported for certain subsidiaries is as follows:  



 

 

 



Investment Management Subsidiary

Investment Discretion

 

Voting Authority



Sole

Sole

None



 

 

 

BlackRock Fund Advisors

1,649,583 1,649,583 

 

BlackRock Investment Management, LLC

44,519 44,519 

 

BlackRock Advisors LLC

27,780 27,780 

 

BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited

24,000 24,000 

 

7 other BlackRock subsidiaries

5,616 5,616 

 

BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.

342,298 334,156 8,142 

BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.

12,505 10,968 1,537 

BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited

4,205 3,222 983 

Aperio Group, LLC

15,752 15,578 174 

2

APG Asset Management N.V. reported shared investment discretion with broad financialtwo additional reporting managers and operations experiencesole voting authority as to all such shares.

·3

Focused on strategyThe Vanguard Group, Inc. reported beneficial ownership of 1,576,456 shares with sole investment discretion and executionno voting authority,  19,796 shares held by Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co. with shared investment discretion and shared voting authority, 13,474 shares held by Vanguard Global Advisors, LLC with shared investment discretion and (i) shared voting authority with respect to 171 shares, and (ii) no voting authority with respect to 13,303 shares, and 2,597 shares held by Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. with shared investment and shared voting authority.

·4

Extensive public company board experienceNeuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC reported shared investment discretion and sole voting authority with respect to 867,575 shares, shared investment discretion and no voting authority with respect to 10,108 shares, and sole investment discretion and sole voting authority with respect to 6,043 shares.

10


The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock, as of October 17, 2022, by (i) each current director, director nominee, and NEO, and (ii) all current directors, director nominee, NEOs, and other executive officers as a group:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership1

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           Number

 

Percent

of Class

Steven A. Brass

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,389 

2

*

Jay W. Rembolt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,394 

3

*

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,347 

4

*

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,574 

5

*

Cynthia B. Burks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         -

 

*

Daniel T. Carter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,554 

6

*

Melissa Claassen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,901 

6

*

Eric P. Etchart

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,692 

7

*

Lara L. Lee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

600 

6

*

Edward O. Magee, Jr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

549 

8

 

Trevor I. Mihalik

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,994 

9

*

Graciela I. Monteagudo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

970 

6

*

David B. Pendarvis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,360 

6

*

Garry O. Ridge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

78,546 

10

*

Gregory A. Sandfort

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,982 

11

*

Anne G. Saunders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,460 

6

*



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All current directors, director nominee, NEOs, and other executive officers of the Company, as a group (19 persons)

 

196,546 

12

1.5%

Committees*:Less than 1%.  

Based on 13,579,926 shares of common stock outstanding as of the close of business on October 17, 2022.

·1

AuditAll shares owned directly unless otherwise indicated.

·2

CompensationMr. Brass has the right to receive: (i) 108 shares upon settlement of vested deferred performance units (“DPUs”) upon termination of employment and (ii) 1,826 shares within 60 days upon vesting and settlement of restricted stock units (“RSUs”).

·3

FinanceMr. Rembolt has the right to receive:  (i) 310 shares upon settlement of vested DPUs upon termination of employment and (ii) 772 shares within 60 days upon vesting and settlement of RSUs. Mr. Rembolt also has voting and investment power over 6,712 shares held in the WD-40 Company Profit Sharing / 401(k) Plan (“401(k) Plan”).  

4

Ms. Kiamilev has the right to receive:  (i) 190 shares within 60 days upon vesting and settlement of RSUs.

5

Ms. Olsem has the right to receive:  (i) 89 shares upon settlement of vested DPUs upon termination of employment and (ii) 778 shares within 60 days upon vesting and settlement of RSUs. 

6

Shares shown represent the right to receive all such shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company,

7

Mr. Etchart has the right to receive 4,192 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company.

8

Mr. Magee has the right to receive 437 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company.   

9

Mr. Mihalik has the right to receive 1,692 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company.    

10

Total includes the right to receive: (i) 5,884 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service to the Company,  (ii) 967 shares upon settlement of vested DPUs upon termination of service to the Company,  and (iii) 3,917 shares within 60 days upon vesting and settlement of RSUs, and 12,472 shares owned directly by Mr. Ridge’s spouse and held in the Company’s 401(k) Plan. Mr. Ridge also has voting and investment power over 1,319 shares he owns directly that are held in the Company’s 401(k) Plan.

11

Mr. Sandfort has the right to receive 12,628 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company.

12Total includes the rights of directors, director nominee, NEOs, and other executive officers to receive a total of 49,677 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of employment or service as a director of the Company, the rights of all executive officers to receive 2,002 shares upon settlement of vested DPUs upon termination of employment, the rights of all executive officers to receive a total of 8,472 shares within 60 days upon vesting and settlement of RSUs, and a total of 8,031 shares directly held by all executive officers in the Company’s 401(k) Plan.  

11


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of the Company’s stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of stock ownership and reports of changes in stock ownership. Reporting persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company during the last fiscal year and written representations that no other reports were required, except as described below, all Section 16(a) requirements were complied with by all persons required to report with respect to the Company’s equity securities during the last fiscal year.

On December 22, 2021, due to a technical filing error, Graciela I. Monteagudo filed a late report on Form 4 to report 332 RSUs granted on December 14, 2021 in connection with her service as a director.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Corporate Governance Policies Reflect Best Practices

Annual election of all directors with majority voting requirement

Executive sessions of independent directors held at each regularly scheduled board meeting

Governance guidelines for independent director leadership, including overboarding policy and other best governance practices

Annual performance evaluations for board, committees and directors

Annual consideration of succession planning for the board, the CEO, and senior management

Company prohibits pledging and hedging of Company stock by directors

11 of 12 director nominees are independent, except for CEO and President

Equity grants received by directors must be held until board service ends



BOARD LEADERSHIP AND RISK OVERSIGHT AND COMPENSATION-RELATED RISK



The Board of Directors of WD-40 Company previously maintained separation of its principal executive officer and board chair positions. On October 7, 2019 the Board of Directors amended its Leadership

Corporate Governance Guidelines to provide, under appropriate circumstances, for the designation of the CEO to serve as board chair and for the designation of a lead independent director to assure the most effective board governance when the CEO is also serving as board chair. 

On June 18,Prior to 2019, the Company’s currentleadership structure of the Board generally maintained the separation of its principal executive officer and board chair Linda Lang, provided notice to the Board of her intention not to stand for re-election at the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders.  The Board of Directors has tentatively determined thatpositions. However, since Mr. Ridge, the Company’scurrent Board Chair, has retired as CEO shouldand will not be designated as board chair immediately followingstanding for re-election, the annual meeting.  The Board will designate one of the independent directors to serve as lead director following the annual meeting.

The Board believesdecided that board oversight of and attention to the Company’s current strategic initiatives will be bestare better served by having Mr. Ridgea non-executive chair provide primary leadership at meetings of the Board while assuringafter a new Board is elected at the annual meeting and serve as a liaison between the Board and executive management. Furthermore, the Board believes that separation of the principal executive officer and the board chair position is currently more appropriate for the Company given the increased size of the Board, the continued need for the principal executive officer’s focus and flexibility to implement strategic directives and execute overall management responsibilities. As an independent director, oversightthe non-executive chair can provide leadership to the Board without perceived or actual conflicts associated with individual and collective interests of management. The Board believes that a retiring principal executive officer should not continue to serve as a director beyond his or her current term in order to provide management throughwith an unfettered ability to provide new leadership. The Board’s determination as to whether having an independent director serve as board chair is in the designationbest interests of a lead director.  The lead director will have the following responsibilities and authority:Company is subject to annual review.  



Board Role in Risk Oversight

·

To preside at meetings of the Board when the CEO is not present;

·

To serve as leader of the independent directors and as a liaison between the CEO and the independent directors;

·

To coordinate feedback to the CEO regarding issues discussed in executive sessions;

·

To consult with the CEO and the Corporate Secretary regarding meeting materials and other information sent to the Board;

·

To review Board meeting agendas in consultation with the CEO;

·

To meet periodically with the Board committee chairs to discuss their respective work plans;

·

To approve meeting schedules to assure that there is sufficient time for Board consideration of all agenda items;

·

To call meetings of the independent directors.



Risk oversight is undertaken by the Board of Directors as a whole, but various Board Committees are charged with responsibility to review and report on business and management risks included within the purview of each Committee’s responsibilities. The Compensation Committee considers risks associated with the Company’s compensation policies and practices, with particular focus on the cash incentive compensation (“Incentive Compensation”) and equity awards offered to the Company’s executive officers.officers and the performance metrics to best align the interests of management with the best interest of the Company. The Audit Committee considers risks associated with financial reporting and internal control, risks related to integrityincluding ethics and disaster recovery of primary information technology systems, and supply chain risks associated with disruptive events.compliance program risks.  The Audit Committee also reviews the appropriateness of the Company’s insurance programs. The Finance Committee considers risks associated with the Company’s financial management and investment activities, acquisition-related risks and Employee Retirement Income

12


Security Act of 1974 plan oversight. The Board and the Committees receive periodic reports from management employees having responsibility for the management of particular areas of risk.risk, including risks related to systems integrity and disaster recovery of primary information technology systems, and supply chain risks associated with disruptive events. The Chief Executive OfficerCEO is responsible for overall risk management and provides input to the Board of Directors with respect to the Company’s enterprise risk management processprogram and is responsive to the Board in carrying out its risk oversight role.



With respectCompensation Risk Assessment

In addition to oversight of compensation-related risk by the Compensation Committee, the Company’s management has undertaken an annual assessment of the Company’s compensation policies and practices and strategic business initiatives to determine whether any of these policies or practices, as well as any compensation plan design features, including those applicable to the executive officers, are reasonably likely to have

9


a material adverse effect on the Company. Based on this review, management has concluded that the Company’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. This conclusion is based primarily on the fact that the incentives underlying the Company’s compensation plan design features provide a balance betweenamong increased profitability, long-term growth, and longer-term stockholder returns. Management has discussed these findings with the Compensation Committee.



BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS, COMMITTEES AND ANNUAL MEETING ATTENDANCE



The Board of Directors is charged by the stockholders with managing or directing the management of the business affairs and exercising the corporate power of the Company. The Board of Directors relies on the following standing committees to assist in carrying out the Board of Directors’Board’s responsibilities: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, and the Finance Committee. Each of the committees has a written charter approved by the Board, of Directors and sucheach committee reviews their respective charter annually. Committee charters can be found on WD-40 Company’s website at http://investor.wd40company.com withininvestor.wd40company.com/investors the “Corporate Governance” section.

/corporate-governance/overview.  

There were five meetings of the Board of Directors during the last fiscal year. Each director serving for the full fiscal year attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and of all committees on which the director served. The Board of Directors holds an annual organizational meeting on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Allannual meeting. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting.annual meeting. At the last Annual Meeting of Stockholders,annual meeting, all of the prior year nominee directorsdirector nominees were present. 

EQUITY HOLDING REQUIREMENT FOR DIRECTORS

 

BOARD OFAll RSU awards to non-employee directors, including both non-elective grants and RSU awards granted pursuant to the annual elections of the directors to receive RSUs in lieu of all or part of their base annual fee, provide for immediate vesting but will not be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock until termination of each director’s service as a director. The number of shares to be issued to each non-employee director upon termination of service is disclosed in the footnotes to the table under the heading, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

DIRECTORSINSIDER TRADING POLICY - PROHIBITED HEDGING TRANSACTIONS

The Company maintains an insider trading policy, including transaction pre-approval requirements, applicable to its officers and directors required to report changes in beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock under Section 16 of the Exchange Act as well as certain other employees who have significant management or financial reporting responsibilities and can be expected to have access to material non-public information concerning the Company. The Company’s insider trading policy also requires pre-approval of all trading plans adopted pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act. To avoid the potential for abuse, the Company’s policy with respect to such trading plans is that, once adopted, trading plans are not subject to change or cancellation. Any such change or cancellation of an approved trading plan by an executive officer, director or employee covered by the Company’s insider trading policy in violation of the policy will result in the Company’s refusal to approve future trading plan requests for that person.

The insider trading policy also includes a prohibition on certain hedging and transactions involving the potential for abuse. Pursuant to the insider trading policy, covered officers, directors and employees may not engage in the following transactions involving the Company’s publicly traded securities:

·

Short sale transactionsHedging transactions

·

Transactions in publicly traded options or derivatives Pledges or margin account borrowing 

13


STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

Stockholders may send communications to the Board by submitting a letter addressed to: WD-40 Company, Corporate Secretary, 9715 Businesspark Avenue, San Diego, CA 92131.

The Board has instructed the Corporate Secretary to review and forward such communications to the Board Chair. The Board has also instructed the Corporate Secretary to exercise his or her discretion, to not forward to the Board Chair any communication which is deemed of a commercial or frivolous nature or inappropriate for consideration by the Board. The Corporate Secretary may also forward the stockholder communication within the Company to another department to facilitate an appropriate response.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



Director compensationCompensation for non-employee directors is set by the Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee conducts an annuala biennial review of non-employee director compensation, including consideration of a survey of director compensation for the same peer group of companies used by the Compensation Committee for the assessment of executive compensation. For fiscal year 2019,2022, non-employee directors received compensation for services as directors pursuant to the Directors’ Compensation Policy and Election Plan (the “Director Compensation Policy”) adopted by the Board of Directors on October 8, 2018.12, 2021. Pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy, non-employee directors received a base annual fee of $54,000 for services provided from January 1, 2019 through the date of the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.$60,000.  The Board Chairlead independent director received an additional annual feecompensation of $22,000.$24,000. Non-employee directors received additional cash compensation for service on various Board Committees. The Chair of the Audit Committee received $16,000$18,000 and each other member of the Audit Committee received $8,000.$10,000. The Chair of the Compensation Committee received $10,000$12,000 and each other member of the Compensation Committee received $4,000.$5,000. Each Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee and the Finance Committee received $8,000$10,000 and each other member of those committees received $4,000.$5,000. All such annual fees were paid in March 2019.2022.



At the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,annual meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved the WD-40 Company 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock“2016 Stock Incentive Plan”) to authorize the issuance of stock-based compensation awards to employees as well as to directors and consultants. For services provided for the period from the date of the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to the next annual meeting, theThe Director Compensation Policy providedprovides for thean annual grant of restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards having a grant date value of $70,000approximately $80,000 to each non-employee director. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock. On December 11,  2018,14, 2021, each non-employee director other than Ms. Saunders received a non-elective RSU award covering 392 shares of the Company’s common stock. On March 18, 2019, Ms. Saunders received an RSU award covering 405332 shares of the Company’s common stock. Additional information regarding the RSU awards is provided in a footnote to the Director Compensation table below.



Each non-employee director was also permitted to elect to receive an RSU award in lieu of all or a portion of his or her base annual fee for service as a director as specified above. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to each such RSU award granted to the non-employee directors equaled the elective portion of his or her base annual fee payable in RSUs divided by the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the date of grant.



RSU awards granted to non-employee directors pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy are subject to Award Agreements under the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. AllSuch RSU awards granted to non-employee directors are fully vested, entitled to dividend compensation equivalent to dividends declared and arepaid on the Company’s common stock, and settled in shares of the Company’s common stock upon termination of the director’s service as a director of the Company.



The Company also maintains a Director Contributions Fund from which each incumbent non-employee director has the right, at a specified time each fiscal year, to designate $6,000 in charitable contributions to be made by the Company to properly qualified (under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3)) charitable organizations.



10


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE - FISCALFISCAL YEAR 20192022

 

The following Director Compensation table provides information concerning director compensation earned by each non-employee director for services rendered in fiscal year 2019. Since the annual base fee and fees for service on Committees are payable for services provided to the Company from January 1st of the fiscal year until the next annual meeting of stockholders, such compensation is reported for purposes of the Director Compensation table on a weighted basis. For fiscal year 2019, one third of the reported compensation earned or paid in cash is based on the Director Compensation Policy in effect for calendar year 2018 and two thirds of the reported compensation earned or paid in cash is based on the Director Compensation Policy in effect for calendar year 2019.2022. Amounts earned and reported in the Director Compensationfollowing table forunder Fees Earned or Paid in Cash for the fiscal year for each director are dependent upon the various committees on which each director served as a member or as chair during the fiscal year.year and whether the director served as the lead independent director. 

14


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)1

 

Stock Awards
($)2

 

All Other
Compensation
($)3

 

Total
($)

 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)1

 

Stock Awards
($)2

 

All Other
Compensation
($)3

 

Total
($)

Daniel T. Carter

 

$               71,000

 

$               69,941

 

$                 6,000

 

$             146,941

 

$               88,000

 

$               79,962

 

$                 6,000

 

$             173,962

Melissa Claassen

 

$               63,000

 

$               69,941

 

$                 6,000

 

$             138,941

 

$               70,000

 

$               79,962

 

$                 6,000

 

$             155,962

Eric P. Etchart

 

$               61,667

 

$               69,941

 

$                 6,000

 

$             137,608

 

$               75,000

 

$               79,962

 

$                 6,000

 

$             160,962

Linda A. Lang

 

$               81,000

 

$               69,941

 

$                 6,000

 

$             156,941

Lara L. Lee

 

$               75,000

 

$               79,962

 

$                 6,000

 

$             160,962

Edward O. Magee, Jr.4

 

$               52,500

 

$               79,962

 

$                         -

 

$             132,462

Trevor I. Mihalik

 

$               85,000

 

$               79,962

 

$                 6,000

 

$             170,962

Graciela I. Monteagudo

 

$               75,000

 

$               79,962

 

$                 6,000

 

$             160,962

David B. Pendarvis

 

$               60,333

 

$               69,941

 

$                 6,000

 

$             136,274

 

$               75,000

 

$               79,962

 

$                 6,000

 

$             160,962

Daniel E. Pittard

 

$               63,000

 

$               69,941

 

$                 6,000

 

$             138,941

Gregory A. Sandfort

 

$               65,000

 

$               69,941

 

$                 6,000

 

$             140,941

 

$               99,000

 

$               79,962

 

$                 6,000

 

$             184,962

Anne G. Saunders

 

$               44,000

 

$               69,944

 

$                         -

 

$             113,944

 

$               77,000

 

$               79,962

 

$                 6,000

 

$             162,962

Neal E. Schmale

 

$               67,000

 

$               69,941

 

$                 6,000

 

$             142,941

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

For services rendered during fiscal year 2019,Except for Mr. Magee and Mses. Lee, Monteagudo, and Saunders, directors receivedreceive RSU awards pursuant to elections made in 2017 (not applicable to Mr. Pittard and Ms. Saunders)  and 2018 (not applicable to Mr. Pittard, Ms. Saunders and Mr. Schmale) under the Director Compensation Policy with respect to their services as directors in calendar years 2018 (not applicable to Ms. Saunders) and 2019, respectively, in each case in lieu of cash for all or part of their base annual fees for such calendar year (as described in the narrative precedingpursuant to elections made as permitted under the Director Compensation table).Policy. The value of such elective RSU awards received by each of the directors except for Mr. Pittard,  Ms. SaundersClaassen and Mr. Schmale  for services rendered during fiscal year 2019Messrs. Carter, Etchart, Mihalik, Pendarvis and Sandfort was $50,908. The value of elective RSU awards received by Mr. Schmale for service rendered during fiscal year 2019 was $14,986.  Mr. Pittard and Ms. Saunders elected to receive all of their base annual fees in cash.approximately $60,000.  The number of shares underlying each director’s RSU award is rounded down to the nearest whole share. Mr. Magee and Mses. Lee, Monteagudo, and Saunders elected to receive their fiscal year 2022 base annual fees in cash.

2

Amounts included in thereported under Stock Awards column represent the grant date fair value for non-elective RSU awards granted to all non-employee directors pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy. On December 11, 2018,14, 2021, each director other than Ms. Saunders, received a non-elective RSU award covering 392332 shares of the Company’s common stock. Each RSU award granted on December 11, 2018 has astock, with the exception of Mr. Magee who was appointed in June 2022.  The grant date fair value equal toof approximately $80,000 equals the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date in the amount of $178.42 per share multiplied by the number of shares underlying the RSU award. On March 18, 2019 Ms. Saunders received a  non-elective RSU award covering 405 shares of the Company’s common stock having a grant date, fair value equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date in the amount of $172.70 per sharewhich was $240.85 multiplied by the number of shares underlying the RSU award. The number of shares underlying each director’s RSU award is rounded down to the nearest whole share. Outstanding RSUs held by each director as of October 15, 201917, 2022 are reported above in footnotes to the table under the heading, Security Ownership of DirectorsCertain Beneficial Owners and Executive Officers. The RSUs vest immediately upon grant, but are settled in stock only upon termination of service as a director. The RSUs provide for the payment of dividend equivalent compensation in amounts equal to dividends declared and paid on the Company’s common stock.Management table.  

3

Amounts represent charitable contributions made by the Company in fiscal year 20192022 as designated by non-employee directors pursuant to the Company’s Director ContributionContributions Fund.

4

On June 21, 2022,  Mr. Magee received a non-elective RSU award covering 437 shares of the Company’s common stock with a grant date fair value of approximately $80,000, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date of $182.98.





EQUITY HOLDING REQUIREMENT FOR DIRECTORSBOARD COMMITTEES



All RSU awards to non-employee directors, including both non-elective grants and RSU awards granted pursuant to the annual elections of the directors to receive RSUs in lieu of all or part of their base annual fee, provide for immediate vesting but will not be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock until termination of each director’s service as a director. The number of shares to be issued to each non-employee director upon termination of service is disclosed in the footnotes to the table under the heading, Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers.

11


STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Stockholders may send communications to the Board of Directors by submitting a letter addressed to: WD-40 Company, Corporate Secretary, 9715 Businesspark Avenue, San Diego, CA 92131.  

The Board of Directors has instructed the Corporate Secretary to forward such communications to the Board Chair. The Board of Directors has also instructed the Corporate Secretary to review such correspondence and, at the Corporate Secretary’s discretion, to not forward correspondence which is deemed of a commercial or frivolous nature or inappropriate for consideration by the Board of Directors. The Corporate Secretary may also forward the stockholder communication within the Company to another department to facilitate an appropriate response.

COMMITTEES (membership as of October 15, 2019)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director

 

Audit

 

Compensation

 

Corporate
Governance

 

Finance

Daniel T. Carter

 

Chair

 

 

 

 

 

Melissa Claassen

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chair

Eric P. Etchart

 

 

 

 

 

Chair

 

Linda A. Lang

 

 

 

 

 

 

David B. Pendarvis

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel E. Pittard

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gregory A. Sandfort

 

 

 

Chair

 

 

 

Anne G. Saunders

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neal E. Schmale

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Meetings Held in Fiscal Year 2019

 

5

 

3

 

4

 

4



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Nomination Policies and Procedures  

   

The Corporate Governance Committee is comprised of Eric P. Etchart (Chair), LindaDaniel T. Carter, Trevor I. Mihalik, Gregory A. Lang (retiring director),  David B. Pendarvis, Daniel E. PittardSandfort and Anne G. Saunders.Saunders,  each of whom is an independent director as defined under the Nasdaq Rules. The Corporate Governance Committee also functions as the Company’s nominating committee and is comprised exclusively of independent directors as defined in the Nasdaq Rules.committee. The Corporate Governance Committee met four times during the last fiscal year.



Nomination Policies and Procedures

The Corporate Governance Committee acts in conjunction with the Board of Directors to ensure that a regular evaluation is conducted of succession plans, performance, independence, and of the qualifications and integrity of the Board of Directors.Board. The Corporate Governance Committee also reviews the applicable skills and characteristics required of nominees for election as directors. The objective is to balance the composition of the Board of Directors to achieve a combination of individuals of different backgrounds and experiences including, but not limited to, whetheras described more fully below.  Although the candidate is currently or has recently been an executive officer at a publicly traded company; whether the candidate has substantial background in matters related to the Company’s products or markets, in particular, retailing and marketing and new product development; and whether the candidate has substantial governance or executive compensation experience, global management experience, a substantial financial background or is serving as a director at one or more publicly traded companies. The Board of Directors has not established any specific diversity criteria for the selection of nominees other than the general composition criteria noted above.below, the current Board composition includes four female directors  (1/3 of the Board), one of whom chairs a Board committee, one African-American, one Hispanic, and six non-U.S. directors (1/2 of the Board). The Corporate Governance Committee also oversees an annual process of self-evaluation conducted by each committee of the Board and for the Board as a whole, which includes a board evaluation, individual self-evaluations and peer evaluations.

 

In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the director’s past attendance at meetings, results of evaluations and the director’s participation in and anticipated future contributions to the Board of Directors.Board. A director who will have reached the age of 72 prior to the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders will be expected to retire from the Board. However, the Board may re-nominate any director for up to three additional years if the Board makes a specific finding that relevant circumstances warrant continued service.  The Board has determined, for each of the past two years, that Mr. Schmale should continue to serve as a director.

15




The Corporate Governance Committee reviews new Board of Director nominees through a series of internal discussions, reviewing available information, and interviewing selected candidates. Generally, candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors have been identified and compiled in a database through director networking resources and professional organizations or suggested by individual directors or employees. The Company does not currently employ a search firm or third party in connection with seeking or evaluating candidates.

The Corporate Governance Committee considers director recruitment and succession planning for the Board at each quarterly meeting. This review entails consideration of various factors that the Corporate Governance Committee believes to be relevant to ensure that the Board maintains a level of diversity and experience that is appropriate for its oversight and governance responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Committee considers the extent of each director’s experience in senior leadership roles and as directors on other public company boards, including service on committees and as committee or board chairs, in addition to age and the tenure of each director on the Board.  Beyond a baseline expectation that directors and director nominees will share the Company values and have demonstrated an ability to promote and sustain a strong corporate culture, the Board endeavors to ensure that the mix of skills among existing directors is appropriate for the evolving business of the Company. To emphasize the importance of continuing education, directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with attending continuing education programs and conferences and acquiring certain certifications to assist them in remaining abreast of developments in critical issues relating to the operation of public company boards, including environmental, social, and corporate governance.

The following list of specific skills are among the areas of expertise and experience that the Corporate Governance Committee believes will best serve the Company. The list is updated from time to time and each director’s skills in these areas are graded on a scale to assess the level of competence in each area that is available to the Board as a whole. The table below presents those areas in which the Board has determined that individual directors have deep or knowledgeable level of expertise only, and individual directors who are only familiar with those areas are not captured on the table. This information will assist the Board in identifying areas of strengths and weaknesses and will guide the Board on formulating the applicable skills and characteristics of future nominees.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Skills and
Experience

Steven A. Brass

Cynthia B. Burks

Daniel T. Carter

Melissa Claassen

Eric P. Etchart

Lara L. Lee

Edward O. Magee, Jr.

Trevor I. Mihalik

Graciela I. Monteagudo

David B. Pendarvis

Gregory A. Sandfort

Anne G. Saunders

Finance

X

X

X

X

X

X

Legal, Regulatory, Compliance

X

X

Leadership, Human Capital, Exec. Comp

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Industry:  Consumer / Retail Markets

X

X

X

X

X

X

Omni-Channel Marketing; Digital

X

X

X

X

X

International / Global Business

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

IT / Cybersecurity

X

Operations

X

X

X

X

X

Innovation

X

X

X

ESG

X

X

X

16


BOARD DIVERSITY MATRIX (as of October 17, 2022)

Total Number of Directors:  12

 

 

Female

 

Male

 

Non-Binary

Did Not

Disclose Gender



Part I: Gender Identity

4

8

 

 



Part II: Demographic Background

African American or Black

 

1

 

 

Alaskan Native or Native American

 

 

 

 

Asian

 

 

 

 

Hispanic or Latinx

1

 

 

 

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

 

 

 

 

White

3

7

 

 

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

 

 

 

 

LGBTQ+

 

 

 

 

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Part III:  Non-U.S. Directors (Born Outside the U.S.)

2

4

 

 



The Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by security holders under the same criteria as other candidates described above. Nominations may be submitted by letter addressed to: WD-40 Company Corporate Governance Committee, Attn:  Corporate Secretary, 9715 Businesspark Avenue, San Diego, California 92131. Nominations by security

12


holders must be submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Company’s Bylaws, including submission of such nominations within the time required for submission of stockholdershareholder proposals as set forth below under the heading, Stockholder Proposals.  



AUDIT COMMITTEE

Related Party Transactions Review and Oversight



The Audit Committee is comprised of Daniel T. Carter (Chair), Daniel E. Pittard, Anne G. SaundersLara L. Lee, Edward O. Magee, Jr., Trevor I. Mihalik, Graciela I. Monteagudo and Neal E. Schmale.David Pendarvis, each of whom are independent directors as defined under the Nasdaq Rules. Five meetings of the Audit Committee were held during the last fiscal year to review quarterly financial reports, to consider the annual audit and other audit services, to review the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm after its completion and to fulfill other responsibilities provided for in the Audit Committee’s Charter. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Carter is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Carter and each of the other members of the Audit Committee are independent directors as defined in the Nasdaq Rules.SEC. Each member of the Audit Committee also satisfies the requirements for service on the Audit Committee as set forth in Rule 5605(c)(2) of the Nasdaq Rules.



The Audit Committee has responsibility for review and oversight of related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest. Related party transactions include any independent business dealings between the Company and related parties who consist of the Company’s executive officers, directors, director nominees and holders of more than 5% of the Company’s shares. Such transactions include business dealings with parties in which any such related party has a material direct or indirect interest. The Audit Committee has adopted a written policy to provide for its review and oversight of related party transactions. Executive officers and directors are required to notify the Secretary of the Company of any proposed or existing related party transactions in which they have an interest. The Secretary and the Audit Committee also rely upon the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures adopted pursuant to Exchange Act rules for the purpose of assuring that matters requiring disclosure, including related party transactions that may involve the potential for conflicts of interests, are brought to the attention of management and the Audit Committee on a timely basis. Certain related party transactions do not require Audit Committee review and approval. Such transactions are considered pre-approved. Pre-approved transactions include:

·

compensation arrangements approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors and expense reimbursements consistent with the Company’s expense reimbursement policy;

·

transactions in which the related party’s interest is derived solely from the fact that he or she serves as a director of another corporation that is a party to the transaction;

·

transactions in which the related party’s interest is derived solely from his or her ownership (combined with the ownership interests of all other related parties) of not more than a 5% beneficial interest (but excluding any interest as a general partner of a partnership) in an entity that is a party to the transaction; and

·

transactions available to all employees of the Company generally.

If a related party transaction is proposed or if an existing transaction is identified, the Audit Committee has authority to disapprove, approve or ratify the transaction and to impose such restrictions or other limitations on the transaction as the Committee may consider necessary to best assure that the interests of the Company are protected and that the related party involved is not in a position to receive an improper benefit. In making such determination, the Audit Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate, including without limitation (i) the benefits to the Company of the transaction; (ii) the commercial reasonableness of the terms of the transaction; (iii) the dollar value of the transaction and its materiality to the Company and to the related party; (iv) the nature and extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction; (v) if applicable, the impact of the transaction on a non-employee director’s independence; and (vi) the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related party participating in the transaction.

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019, there were no transactions required to be reported pursuant to the requirements of Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act that did not require review and approval by the Audit Committee. 

FINANCE COMMITTEE



The Finance Committee is comprised of Melissa ClaassenTrevor I. Mihalik (Chair), Daniel T. Carter, Melissa Claassen, Eric P. Etchart, Edward O. Magee, Jr., Graciela I. Monteagudo and Gregory A. Sandfort,  and Neal E. Schmale.  Foureach of whom is an independent director as defined under the Nasdaq Rules. Five meetings of the Finance Committee were held during the last fiscal year. The Finance Committee is appointed by the Board for the primary purpose of assisting the Board in overseeing financial matters of importance to the Company, including matters relating to acquisitions, investment policy, capital structure, and dividend policy. The Finance Committee also reviews the Company’s annual and long-term financial strategies and objectives.



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee is comprised of Anne G. Saunders (Chair), Melissa Claassen, Lara L. Lee, David B. Pendarvis and Gregory A. Sandfort,  all of whom are independent directors as defined under the Nasdaq Rules. The Compensation Committee met four times during the last fiscal year. The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board for the primary purpose of assisting the Board in matters relating to compensation and benefits of the Company’s executive officers, including management succession.  The Committee is also responsible for establishing the overall compensation strategy for the Company.

1317

 


 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation



The Compensation Committee is comprised of Gregory A. Sandfort (Chair), Melissa Claassen, Linda A. Lang (retiring director),  David B. Pendarvis and Neal E. Schmale, all of whom are independent directors as defined under the Nasdaq Rules. The Compensation Committee met three times during the last fiscal year. During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019,2022, there were no compensation committee interlock relationships with respect to the Company’s executive officers, members of the Board of Directors andand/or the Compensation Committee as described in Item 407(e)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act.





ITEM NO. 2ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE REPORT

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Company believes that taking an integrated approach to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues enhances the sustainability and growth of our business and protects the long-term interests of our stakeholders. Our Board has ultimate authority and has demonstrated its continued commitment to the Company’s performance relative to ESG matters.  

The Company is focused on building an enduring business that can proudly be passed onto the next generation and on being a responsible corporate citizen for the benefit of our stakeholders.



In accordancefiscal year 2018, the Company established a cross-regional, cross-functional ESG Project Team to formally address ESG topics and provide recommendations to management. In that year, the ESG Project Team completed a comprehensive analysis documenting the Company’s activities and guiding structures that fall under the umbrella of ESG.

In fiscal year 2019, the ESG Project Team completed an ESG Materiality Assessment to obtain from various stakeholders their views of which aspects of ESG were of highest importance. In connection with this assessment, the ESG Project Team engaged Sustainability Partners, led by Drs. Mary and Brian Nattrass, well-known and respected experts in sustainability programs for businesses, non-profits, and governments.

In fiscal year 2020, the ESG Project Team completed a Life Cycle Assessment screening for the Company’s flagship product, WD-40® Multi-Use Product, and prepared for the publication of its inaugural ESG report.

In fiscal year 2021, the Company published its first ESG report, which can be found at https://www.wd40company.com/our-company/corporate-responsibility/. After the publication of the ESG report, the ESG Project Team pursued the objectives and focused on four ESG pillars:  1) social impact, 2) carbon and environmental impact, 3) circular supply chain, and 4) product sustainability lens.

The results on these objectives are included in the Company’s latest ESG report, which has been published contemporaneously with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company’s stockholders are being asked to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) identified in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis sectionfiling of this Proxy Statement. This vote is commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote.

AtStatement and can be found at https://www.wd40company.com/our-company/corporate-responsibility/. The 2022 ESG report details the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company’s stockholders were asked, by a non-binding advisory vote, to express their preference as to the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votesESG-related objectives, targets, and the Board of Directors recommended annual Say-on-Pay voting. The Company’s stockholders expressed a preference to have Say-on-Pay votes every year. 

The following resolution will be presentedprogress, for approval by the Company’s stockholders at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of WD-40 Company (the “Company”) hereby approve the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussionfiscal years 2021 and Analysis section of the Company’s proxy statement2022 and establishes objectives and targets for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholdersfiscal years 2023 and in the accompanying compensation tables and narrative disclosures.”

The advisory vote to approve executive compensation is a non-binding vote on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs. This Proxy Statement contains a description of the compensation provided to the NEOs as required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act. 

Stockholders are encouraged to carefully consider the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, accompanying compensation tables and related narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement in considering this advisory vote. The Board of Directors believes that the compensation provided to the Company’s NEOs offers a competitive pay package with a proper balance of current and long-term incentives aligned with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.

This is an advisory vote and will not affect compensation previously paid or awarded to the NEOs. While a vote disapproving the NEOs’ executive compensation will not be binding on the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee will consider the results of the advisory vote in making future executive compensation decisions.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders is required to approve this advisory vote on executive compensation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.2024. 





1418

 


 

COMPEINFORMATION REGARDING OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the names, ages, and current titles of the Company’s executive officers as of August 31, 2022:

Name Age

Title

Garry O. Ridge

65

Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chairman of the Board

Steven A. Brass

56

President and Chief Operating Officer; Director

Jay W. Rembolt

71

Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Patricia Q. Olsem

55

Division President, The Americas

William B. Noble

64

Managing Director, EMEA

Geoffrey J. Holdsworth

60

Managing Director, Asia-Pacific

Jeffrey G. Lindeman

59

Vice President, Global Organizational Development and Chief Human Resources Officer

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

43

Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Mr. Ridge joined the Company’s Australian subsidiary, WD-40 Company (Australia) Pty. Limited (“WD-40 (Australia)”), in 1987 as Managing Director. He held several senior management positions prior to his appointment as CEO, President, and Chairman of the Board in 1997. Mr. Ridge served as President until 2019 and retired as CEO, effective August 31, 2022. Upon his retirement from the Board as Executive Chairman at the 2022 annual meeting, he will serve an honorary role as Chairman Emeritus. 

Mr. Brass joined the Company in 1991 as International Area Manager at the Company’s U.K. subsidiary and has since held several management positions including Country Manager in Germany, Director of Continental Europe, European Sales Director, and European Commercial Director. He then served as Division President, The Americas, from 2016 until 2019, when he was promoted to his President and Chief Operating Officer. In March 2022, Mr. Brass was appointed to the Board and, effective September 1, 2022, Mr. Brass serves as CEO and President.

Mr. Rembolt joined the Company in 1997 as Manager of Financial Services. He was promoted to Controller in 1999 and to Vice President, Finance/Controller in 2001. He was then named Vice President, Finance, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer in 2008 and served until his retirement, effective October 31, 2022, from such positions.

Ms. Olsem joined the Company in 2005 and has held various senior management positions including, Vice President Americas Innovation Development Group, Senior Vice President Marketing and Innovation of the Americas, and Senior Vice President and General Manager of the U. S. She was promoted to her current position as Division President, The Americas in 2019.

Mr. Noble joined the Company’s Australian subsidiary, WD-40 (Australia), in 1993 as International Marketing Manager for the Asia Region. He was then promoted to his current position of Managing Director, EMEA and as a Director of the Company’s U.K. subsidiary, WD-40 Company Limited, in 1996.

Mr. Holdsworth joined the Company’s Australian subsidiary, WD-40 (Australia), in 1996 as General Manager and was promoted to his current position of Managing Director, Asia-Pacific and as a Director of WD-40 (Australia) in 1997.

Mr. Lindeman serves as the Company’s Chief Human Resources Officer and was named Vice President, Global Organizational Development in December 2020. He joined the Company in 2016 and has held management positions within the Company’s EMEA segment, including director of human resources, information technology, supply chain and finance. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lindeman worked as the senior director of talent and engagement for San Diego International Airport from 2006 to 2016.

Ms. Kiamilev joined the Company in May 2021 as Vice President, Legal, and was appointed General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in December 2021.  From 2019 to 2021, Ms.  Kiamilev served as Vice President, Legal, and General Counsel of Kyriba Corp. and held other legal roles from 2014 to 2019. Ms. Kiamilev also served as in-house counsel for Active Network, LLC after practicing law at Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP (currently Dentons US LLP).    

All executive officers hold office at the discretion of the Board. There are no family relationships between any executive officer and any member of the Board. There are no pending litigation or proceedings involving the Company’s officers.

NSATION19


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

WD-40 Company’sThe following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) addresses the executive compensation philosophy, policies and programs, and the processes and decisions of the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) in connection with respect toexecutive compensation for the compensation of the Company’sfollowing Named Executive Officers (the “NEOs”). For of the Company for fiscal year 2019, the Company’s NEOs were:2022:



·

Garry O. Ridge, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (“CEO”);

·

Steven A. Brass, President and Chief Operating Officer

·

Jay W. Rembolt, our Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”);

·

Steven A. Brass, ourPhenix Q. Kiamilev, Vice President, Legal, General Counsel and Chief Operating Officer;Corporate Secretary

·

Richard T. Clampitt, our VicePatricia Q. Olsem, Division President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary; and

·

William B. Noble, our Managing Director, EMEA.Americas



Our Executive Compensation Programs Incorporate Strong Governance Features

No Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

Executive Officers are Subject to Stock Ownership Guidelines

No Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans for Executive Officers

Executive Officers are Prohibited from Hedging or Pledging Company Stock

Long-Term Incentive Awards are Subject to Double-Trigger Vesting upon Change of Control

No Backdating or Re-Pricing of Equity Awards

Annual and Long-Term Incentive Programs Provide
a Balanced Mix of Goals for Profitability, Growth
and Total Stockholder Return Performance

Financial Goals for Performance-Based Equity Awards Never Reset

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS AND RESULTS

 

The compensation structure for the NEOs is comprised of three elements: base salary, retention-related equity compensation, and performance-related cash and equity compensation. Through the application of these elements, a significant portion of NEO realized compensation is directly tied to Company performance measured by increased earnings and total stockholder return (“TSR”). 

Performance-based compensation tied to earnings is based on earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation (in operating departments) and amortization (“EBITDA”), not earnings per share. To measure NEO performance, the Company uses several EBITDA-based measures:

“Adjusted EBITDA” defined as EBITDA before deduction of stock-based compensation expense for any vested performance share unit (“PSU”) awards and excludes other non-operating income and expense amounts;

▪ “Regional Adjusted EBITDA” defined as Adjusted EBITDA computed for each of the Company’s relevant financial reporting segments; and 

“Global Adjusted EBITDA” defined as Adjusted EBITDA computed on a consolidated basis. 



Retention-related equity compensation includes restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards that typically vest annually over a period of three years after grant, subject to earlier vesting upon the effective date of retirement under certain conditions. Retention-related equity compensation features are also reflected in our performance-based market share unit (“MSU”) awards that may be earned over a market return-based vestingmeasurement period of three years,years. MSUs earned are subject to a three-year vesting cliff (or pro-rata vesting at the end of the applicable measurement period in the event of earlier retirement under certain conditions.conditions).

 

Performance-related compensation includes (i) an annual cash payment opportunity that is tied to current fiscal year financial results (“Incentive Compensation”); (ii) MSU awards that are tied to a measure of TSR; and (iii) deferred performance unit (“DPU”)PSU awards that are tied to current fiscal year financial results that exceed levels required for maximum payment of that portion of the cash Incentive Compensation opportunity that is tied to globalGlobal Adjusted EBITDA.

For purposes of measuring performance based on the Company’s EBITDA, the Company uses EBITDA before deduction of the stock-based compensation expense for vested DPU awards, if any, and excluding other non-operating income and expense amounts (“Adjusted EBITDA”).

 

The foregoing compensation structure elements are fully described later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.CD&A.  



In establishingAs part of the framework for overall NEO compensation and in assessing suchassessment of compensation for each NEO in light of individual and overall Company performance, the Committee considers actual and target levels of compensation, with reference to both short-term and long-term

20


performance periods, as well as labor market data, and peer group executive compensation. The Committee seeks to align individual NEO performance incentives with both short-term and long-term Company objectives. The Committee assesses the effectiveness of the established framework for NEO compensation through a review ofby reviewing each of the principal elementselement of NEO compensation. The Committee considers measures of Company performance over multi-year periods, specifically including regional and global measures based on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA, and also relative Company performance as compared to an established peer group of companies and a comparable market index. Additionally, theThe Committee also considers the relative achievement of longer termlonger-term strategic objectives as to which each NEO is accountable. Information regarding NEO strategic objectives is provided in the Executive Officer Compensation Decisions for Fiscal Year 2022 section below under the heading, Base Salary: Process. The Committee believes that a review of NEO compensation and relative company performance over multi-year periods demonstrates the effectiveness of the Company’s established framework for NEO compensation.



THREE YEAR PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION REVIEW



For fiscal year 2019,2022, the Company’s overall financial performance resulted in partialrelatively low achievement of performance measure goals for regionaldue to impacts of the inflationary environment and global supply chain disruptions in fiscal year 2022 that most severely impacted the Americas and EMEA regions. The Company’s financial results for Regional Adjusted EBITDA under the Company’s Performance Incentive Compensation program (the “Performance Incentive Program”) as described below.  The maximum first level performance measure goals forProgram was variable depending on the EMEA and Asia-Pacific regions were achieved, but only a modestregion.  No portion of the first level performance goal for the Americas or EMEA region was achieved.  Due to the strong performance of the EMEA and Asia-Pacific segments and modest achievement of goals for the Americas segment,achieved, while the maximum first level goal for global Adjusted EBITDA for the Asia Pacific region was achieved.  The Company achieved 26.3% of the first level goal for Global Adjusted EBITDA and approximately 35.6%none of the second level goal for globalGlobal Adjusted EBITDA. Each of the NEOs identified for fiscal year 2022, other than Ms. Olsem, earned Incentive Compensation equal to approximately 13% of their Incentive Compensation opportunity because for such NEOs, 50% of their opportunity was based on approximately 26.3% achievement of the first level goal for Global Adjusted EBITDA. Ms. Olsem earned none of her Incentive Compensation opportunity because neither the Regional Adjusted EBITDA goal for the Americas nor the second level goal for Global Adjusted EBITDA was achieved. 

For fiscal year 2021, the Company’s overall financial performance resulted in a very high level of achievement of performance measure goals for Regional Adjusted EBITDA and Global Adjusted EBITDA under the Company’s incentive compensation program (the “Performance Incentive Program”) as described below.  With the exception of Regional Adjusted EBITDA for the Americas, which achieved 78% of the maximum for the first level goal for Adjusted EBITDA, the maximum first level goal for Adjusted EBITDA for the EMEA and Asia Pacific regions were achieved and the maximum first and second level goals for Global Adjusted EBITDA were achieved. As a result, for fiscal year 2019,2021, each of the NEOs other than Mr. BrassMs. Olsem earned Incentive Compensation equal to 68%  of their maximum Incentive Compensation opportunity and Mr. BrassMs. Olsem earned approximately 89% of her maximum Incentive Compensation equal to 26% of his Incentive Compensation opportunity for fiscal year 2019.opportunity.

15




For fiscal year 2018,2020, the Company’s overall financial performance resulted in partialhighly variable achievement of performance measure goals for regional and globalRegional Adjusted EBITDA under the Company’s Performance Incentive Program. The maximumDepending on local market impacts resulting from efforts to slow the spread of COVID‑19, most local market results for the Company were either quite strong or very poor. Due to this variability, a modest portion of the first level performance measure goalsgoal for the Americas and Asia-Pacific regions wereregion was achieved, but noa small portion of the first level performance goal for the EMEA region was achieved. Due to the strong performanceachieved, and no portion of the Americas andfirst level performance goal for the Asia-Pacific segments,region was achieved. As a result, a small portion of the maximum first level goal for globalGlobal Adjusted EBITDA was achieved and approximately 26.6%none of the second level goal for globalGlobal Adjusted EBITDA was achieved. As a result, for fiscal year 2018 eachEach of the NEOs identified for fiscal year 2018 disclosures2020, other than Ms. Olsem, earned Incentive Compensation equal to 63%approximately 10% of their Incentive Compensation opportunity for fiscal year 2018. 

For fiscal year 2017, the Company’s overall financial performance resulted in partial achievementwhile Ms. Olsem earned Incentive Compensation equal to approximately 35% of performance measure goals for regional and global Adjusted EBITDA under the Company’s Performanceher Incentive Program. The maximum first level performance measure goals for the EMEA and Asia-Pacific regions were achieved, but the first level performance goal for the Americas region was not achieved.Compensation opportunity. Due to the strong performanceextreme variability of the EMEA and Asia-Pacific segments, the maximum first level goal for global Adjusted EBITDA was achieved and approximately 47%impacts of the second level goal for global Adjusted EBITDA was achieved.COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s financial results across local markets and regions, the Company awarded additional cash compensation to employees, including NEOs, who did not receive at least 25% of their Incentive Compensation opportunity. As a result, each of the NEOs other than Ms. Olsem (who received more than 25% of her Incentive Compensation opportunity) received a supplemental cash compensation award identified as a “Bonus” for fiscal year 2017 disclosures earned Incentive Compensation2020 in an amount equal to 74%approximately 15% of their Incentive Compensation opportunity for fiscal year 2017.opportunity.



For the three fiscal years ended August 31, 2019,2022, the TSR for the Company’s shares exceeded,fell below, by an absolute percentage point difference, the return for the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”) by 22.4%10.9%. As a result, MSUs awarded to theapplicable NEOs in October 2016 provided vested shares of the Company’s common stock to the NEOs, other than Mr. Brass, at 200%  of the target number of award shares. Mr. Brass earned 150%  of the target number of award shares for the MSUs awarded to him in October 2016. 2019 did not vest and were forfeited.



For the three fiscal years ended August 31, 2018,2021, the TSR for the Company’s shares exceeded, by an absolute percentage point difference, the return for the Index by 48.45%23.6%. As a result, MSUs awarded to applicable NEOs in October 2015 to the NEOs identified for fiscal year 2018 disclosures provided vested shares of the Company’s common stock to thosesuch NEOs, other than Mr. Brass,Ms. Olsem, at the maximum amount of 200% of the target number of award shares. Mr. BrassMs. Olsem earned 150% of the target number of award shares for the MSUs awarded to himher in October 2015. 2018.



For the three fiscal years ended August 31, 2017,2020, the TSR for the Company’s shares exceeded, by an absolute percentage point difference, the return for the Index by 33.32%79.2%. As a result, MSUs awarded to applicable NEOs in October 2014 to the NEOs identified for fiscal year 2017 disclosures provided vested shares of the Company’s common stock to thosesuch NEOs,other than Ms. Olsem, at the maximum amount of 200% of the target number of award shares. Ms. Olsem earned 150% of the target number of award shares for the MSUs awarded to her in October 2017.

21




FISCAL YEAR 20192022 COMPENSATION DECISIONS



Compensation decisions for fiscal year 20192022 were made in October 20182021 based on individual and Company performance during fiscal year 20182021 and a market survey conducted by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant.The relative market percentile of total compensation for each of the NEOs for fiscal year 2019 is based on peer group data which is provided below under the heading Overall Reasonableness ofconsultant, ClearBridge Compensation Group, LLC (“Clearbridge”).

 

The following is a summary of thesuch decisions made by the Committee for NEO compensation for fiscal year 2019:2022:  



·

For fiscal year 2019,2022, base salaries were increased from fiscal year 2021 salary amounts for NEOs  as follows:  a 2.5% increase for all executive officers, except for Ms. Olsem who received a 10% increase.  These increases in base salaries were reasonable and generally modest since NEOs did not receive an increase for fiscal year 2021 due to the continuing uncertainty for the NEOs were increased by 2.0% forglobal economy, labor markets, and the CEO and from 2.0% to 15.0%  for the other NEOs. Base salaries for the NEOs were assessed in relation to labor market information.  For fiscal year 2019, consideration was givenCompany’s business attributable to the appropriate relative mix of salary, annual Incentive Compensation and equity awards.COVID-19 pandemic. 

·

Annual Incentive Compensation is awarded to the NEOs under the Company’s Performance Incentive Compensation Plan as described below under the heading Performance Incentive Program.  For purposes ofUnder the Performance Incentive Program, goals for regionalRegional Adjusted EBITDA and globalGlobal Adjusted EBITDA were established at the beginning of the fiscal year. The Company’s performance as measured against these goals is described in detail below.

·

In October 2018,2021, the NEOs received annual the following stock-based awards:

·

RSU awards providing for the issuance of a total of 6,3737,288 shares of the Company’s common stock to be earned by continued employment by the Company over a vesting period of three years, subject to earlier vesting upon the effective date of retirement under certain conditions. These awards serve a retention purpose together with an incentive to maximize long term stockholder value through share price appreciation.

·

In October 2018, the NEOs received MSU awards subject to performance vesting covering a target number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 6,373totaling 7,288 shares. If the Company’s TSR over the three-year vestingmeasurement period matches the median return for the Index, the target number of shares of the Company’s common stock would vest and be issued to the NEOs.  The

16


actual number of shares to be issued to the NEOs will be from 0% to 200% of the target number of shares depending upon the Company’s TSR as compared to the return for the Index

·

In October 2018, the NEOs received DPUPSU awards that providedproviding an opportunity to receive up to an aggregatea maximum of 7,450 additional6,430 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock upon termination of employment.stock. The DPUPSU awards providedprovide for vesting as ofat the end of fiscal year 20192022 if the Company were to achieveachieves a level of globalGlobal Adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal year in excess of the maximum goal for globalGlobal Adjusted EBITDA established for the Performance Incentive Program.  Since theThe Company’s globalGlobal Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal year 2019  did not exceed2022 fell short of the maximumminimum goal for globalGlobal Adjusted EBITDA established for the Performance Incentive Program,Program. As a result, the DPUPSU awards for fiscal year 2019 did not vest and they have lapsed without value to the NEOs.were forfeited.

·

RSU, MSU and DPU award amountsEquity awards for fiscal year 20192022 varied among the NEOs based on labor market compensation practices specific to the region of employment, relative achievement of individual performance measures and goals established for each NEO, as well as Company performance for fiscal year 20182022 in areas over which each NEO had direct influence.

·

The Company’s stockholders have provided advisory votes to approve executive compensation required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act (the “Say-on-Pay” votes) at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders for fiscal years 2016, 2017 and 2018. In each instance, at least 95% of the votes cast in the Say-on-Pay votes approved the compensation of the NEOs as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s Proxy Statements for those fiscal years and in the accompanying compensation tables and narrative disclosures. The Committee has considered the results of these advisory Say-on-Pay votes in its decision-making for executive compensation of the NEOs and has concluded that no significant changes in executive compensation decisions and policies are warranted.    For additional details on Say-on-Pay results, please refer to Item No. 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (“Say-on-Pay”)above. 

In March 2022, the Committee made compensation decisions, which included a grant of 5,347 RSUs, in connection with Mr. Ridge’s retirement as CEO as of August 31, 2022 and Chairman of the Board as of December 13, 2022. A summary of such decisions is set forth in the Executive Compensation section under the heading, “Summary of Transition and Release Agreement with Garry O. Ridge.”

GOVERNANCE OF EXECUTIVEEXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PROGRAM



The primary purpose of the Committee is to establish and administer the compensation and benefit arrangements for our CEO and the other NEOs and executive officers of the Company, including the other NEOs, on behalf of the Board of Directors.Board. The Committee is responsible for developing and reviewing the Company’s overall executive compensation strategy, with support from management and consultants. For fiscal year 2022 

22


executive compensation decisions, the Committee’sCommittee engaged an independent compensation consulting firm. For fiscal year 2019 compensation decisions, the Committee’s compensation consulting firm, was Board Advisory, LLC.ClearBridge. The Committee also has responsibilities in connection with administration ofthe authority to administer the Company’s equity compensation plans.



The Committee operates pursuant to a Charter whichcharter that outlines its responsibilities, including evaluating the Committee’s responsibilities with respect to performance reviews and approval ofapproving annual compensation arrangementsand benefits for the Company’s executive officers. A copy of the Compensation Committee Charter (“Compensation Charter”), which is reviewed annually, can be found on WD-40the Company’s website at http://investor.wd40company.comwithinin the “Corporate Governance” section



PROCESS FOR EVALUATING EXECUTIVE OFFICER PERFORMANCE AND COMPENSATION



In accordance with its Compensation Charter, the Committee works with the Company’s Human Resources function in carrying out its responsibilities. The Vice President of Global OrganizationOrganizational Development is management’s liaison with the Committee. The Committee’s independent compensation consulting firmClearBridge provides advice and information relating to executive compensation.compensation and benefits. For fiscal year 2019, the compensation consulting firm2022,  ClearBridge assisted the Committee in the evaluation of executive base salary, Incentive Compensation opportunities,cash incentives, equity incentive design and award levels, and the specific pay recommendation for our CEO. The Committee’s compensation consulting firmClearBridge reports directly to the Committee and provides no additional services forto management.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND FRAMEWORK

 

COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES



The Company’s executive compensation program for executive officers is designed to achieve five primary objectives:



1.Attract, motivate, reward and retain high performing executives;

2.Align the interests and compensation of executives with the value created for stockholders;

3.Create a sense of motivation among executives to achieve both short- and long-term Company objectives;

4.Create a direct, meaningful link between business and team performance and individual accomplishment and rewards; and

5.Ensure our compensation programs are appropriately competitive in the relevant labor markets.

17




TARGET PAY POSITION/POSITION / MIX OF PAY

 

The Company’s compensation program consists primarily of base salary, annual cash incentives, and long-term oriented equity awards. Each of these components is discussed in greater detail in the Executive Officer Compensation Decisions section below. The Committee has established aconsiders multiple factors when establishing target total compensation opportunities for executive officer total compensation (defined asofficers (including base salary, plus target Incentive Compensation, plus the value ofincentive compensation, and RSU, PSU and MSU equity awards) at the median market level. Specifically, compensation is determined considering internal factors (including, but not limited to, individual performance, complexity of compensation for each position (details on the use of peer group data to establish the median market level are provided below). Actual pay may vary, based on Company and/or individual performance,job function, length of time within the position and anticipated contribution. Thecontribution) as well as external market data. When using external market data, the Committee does not adhere totarget a specific guidelines regardingpay positioning. Instead, the percentageCommittee reviews the full range of market data, with a specific focus on market 50th percentile of total compensation that should be represented by each compensation component, but monitors market competitiveness. A review of total compensationas a reference point. The Committee then assesses internal factors for each NEO relativeexecutive officer, which results in final total target pay levels above or below the market 50th percentile, depending on the Committee’s individual assessment. Based on recent market analysis, executive officer target pay levels generally fall between the 25th and the 50th percentiles on average, with variability by individual. Actual compensation will vary from target based on the Company’s incentive compensation plan designs, which consider the Company’s performance. This approach is consistent with the Committee’s historic approach to theassessing market data and setting target market percentile is provided in thepay levels (i.e., considering a holistic assessment of relevant internal and external considerations, on an individual case-by-case basis).  Executive Officer Compensation Decisions section below under the heading, Overall Reasonableness of Compensation.



The mix of pay for executive officers is intended to provide significant incentives to drive overall companyCompany performance and increased stockholder value. TheThis mix of pay consists of Salary and All Other Compensation amounts as reported in the Summary Compensation Table under Executive Compensationbelow,  maximum possible values for Stock Awards (RSUs,RSUs, MSUs and DPUs)PSUs (collectively, “Stock Awards”) as reported in the table in footnote 1 to the Summary Compensation Table,  and maximum possible Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (Incentive Compensation)non-equity incentive plan compensation amounts as reported in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below.under Executive Compensation below, and when applicable, Bonus.  The sum total of these maximum possible compensation amounts for each NEONEOs is referred to as the NEO’s “Total Compensation Opportunity.” For purposes ofIn the charts below, the Total Compensation Opportunity for the CEO, and for all other NEOs in the aggregate, has been divided among elements of compensation that are considered at risk (MSUs, tied to longer term relative stockholder return, and DPUsPSUs and Incentive Compensation, tied to current fiscal year financial performance), and those elements that are not performance-based and not considered at risk (Salary, All Other Compensation and RSUs). Approximately 71%59%  of the CEO’s Total Compensation Opportunity for fiscal year 20192022 was at risk (which percentage would have been higher if the additional RSU grant in March 2022 as shown in the table under the section, “Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 2022,” had not been included) while approximately 57%,  in the aggregate,62% of the Total Compensation Opportunity for fiscal year 20192022 for all of the other NEOs was at risk.   As reported in more detail below, for fiscal year 2019,  each of the NEOs other than Mr. Brass earned approximately 68%  of their maximum Incentive Compensation amounts and Mr. Brass earned approximately 26% of his maximum Incentive Compensation amount,  and each NEO earned maximum MSU award values (for the MSU award granted in October 2016), and no portion of their DPU awards.   

Picture 1



Picture 5

1823

 


 

Chart, pie chart

Description automatically generated



COMPENSATION BENCHMARKING



For purposes of itsBefore making fiscal year 20192022 compensation decisions in October 2021, the Committee examined the executive compensation practices of a peer group of nineteen13 publicly traded companies to assess the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation. Peer group companies were selected from a list of U.S. headquartered companies having revenues, earnings, and earningsmarket capitalization reasonably comparable to the Company and doing business in the specialty chemical industry or within specific consumer products categories. Compared to the prior year peer group, the list for fiscal year 2022 excluded two companies, Landec Corporation and Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc., that were no longer considered reasonably comparable to the Company based on revenues, market capitalization and/or primary business focus and added Livent Corporation, which is an international chemicals company that more closely meets the peer group criteria.  In addition to the peer group data, the Committee considers surveys ofconsidered general industry company survey data provided by Korn Ferry Hay Group, a global management consulting firm and Kenexa, an IBM Company. Thesefirm. The Committee applied these data sources are applied by the Committee to establish the market median level of compensation for each executive officer position. The peer group companies used in the peer group analysis for fiscal year 20192022 compensation decisions were as follows:





 

 

 

Aceto Corporation

Innospec Inc.

American Vanguard Corporation

KMG Chemicals, Inc.Livent Corporation

Balchem Corporation

Landec Corporation

Cambrex Corporation

Prestige Brands Holdings,Consumer Healthcare, Inc.

Chase Corporation

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Dorman Products,

Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.

Flotek Industries Inc.

Sensient Technologies Corporation

Hawkins, Inc.

Stoneridge Inc.

Ingevity Corporation

USANA Health Sciences, Inc.

Innophos Holdings,Innospec Inc.

 

 

24

 


EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 20192022

 

BASE SALARY: PROCESS

 

Base salaries for all executive officers, including the NEOs, are approved by the Committee effective for the beginning of each fiscal year. In setting base salaries, the Committee normally considers the salary range prepared by its independent compensation advisorconsultant based on each NEO’s job responsibilities and the market 50th percentile target pay position. Salary adjustments, if any, are based on factors such as individual performance, position, current pay relative to the market, future anticipated contribution and the Company-wideCompany’s merit increase budget. Assessment of individual performance follows a rigorous evaluation process, including self-evaluation and the establishment of annual goals for each executive officer and an assessment of the achievement thereof. Individual performance elements considered in this process included individual and Company performance goals and achievements in such areas as growth, leadership, earnings and governance for Mr. Ridge; growth, leadership, innovation, leadership,brand development, earnings and customer relations for Mr. Ridge;Brass; governance and risk, compliance, forecasting and financial reporting for Mr. Rembolt; business unit performance, teamwork, execution and growth for Messrs. BrassMs. Olsem; and Noble;  and  global brand protection, corporate governance, legal services,  and risk management, and compliance for Mr. Clampitt.Ms. Kiamilev.  



BASE SALARY: FISCAL YEAR 20192022



In October 2018, the Committee reviewed the market competitiveness of2021, base salary increases for executive officer base salaries relative to peer group market data presented by the Committee’s compensation advisor. Based on its review of the peer group market data and the surveys of general industry company data, the Committee approved a 2.0% increase in the CEO’s base salaryofficers for fiscal year 2019 and2022 were approved as follows:  a 2.5% increase from fiscal year 2021 salary amounts for all executive officers, except for Ms. Olsem who received a 10% increase. These increases in base salary rangingsalaries were reasonable and generally modest since executive officers did not receive an increase for fiscal year 2021. Base salaries in fiscal year 2021 remained unchanged from 2.0% to 15.0%fiscal year 2020 due the continuing uncertainty for the other NEOs.global economy, labor markets, and the Company’s business attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic.    



PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PROGRAM

 

The Company uses its Performance Incentive Program, which is a component of the WD-40 Company Performance Incentive Compensation Plan approved by the stockholders at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting, to tie executive officer compensation to the Company’s financial performance. All Company employees participate in the same Performance Incentive Program as described below. The Performance Incentive Program is offered to the executive officers pursuant to the WD-40 Company Performance Incentive Compensation Plan most recently approved by the stockholders at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.    

The Performance Incentive Program provides direct incentives to all Company employees, including executive officers, to affect regional financial performance and, for the Company as a whole, to promote sales at increasing levels of profitability. Specific performance measures tied to regional financial results are used in the Performance Incentive Program formulas as applied to each employee according to his or her particular area of responsibility.

19


 

For the NEOs, Incentive Compensation opportunity awardsopportunities for fiscal year 20192022 were based on pre-established goals for the followingtwo corporate performance measures: (i)  the Company’sRegional Adjusted EBITDA computed for each of the Company’s relevant financial reporting segments (“Regional EBITDA”); andEBITDA; and/or (ii)  Global Adjusted EBITDA computed on a consolidated basis (“Global EBITDA”). The calculations of attainment of these performance measures for the NEOs are substantially the same as the calculations for all other employees for whom such performance measures were applicable.EBITDA.



For purposes ofIn computing the actual financial results to be measured against the goals established for the Regional Adjusted EBITDA and Global Adjusted EBITDA performance measures, the Company may exclude certain expenditures as approved by the Committee. For fiscal year 2019, the Committee approved the exclusion of certain expenses in the amount of approximately $275,000 associated with the Company’s acquisition and renovation of a new office building for the Company’s U.K. subsidiary and certain incremental advertising and sales promotion expenses in the amount of approximately $1,143,000 incurred in order to increase the Company’s digital presence and to build brand awareness.     2022,  no such exclusions were applicable.



The Company’s Incentive Compensation Program, as applied to all of its employees,program is designed with the intent to fund the Incentive Compensation payout to all employees, including the NEOs, from increased earnings over the prior fiscal year.  If the Company does not realize an increase in Global Adjusted EBITDA over the prior fiscal year, it is possible that Mr. Brass and/or Mr. NobleMs. Olsem will earn some Incentive Compensation because the performance measure for a portion of the Incentive Compensation opportunity payable to each of themher is based on Regional Adjusted EBITDA. 



Depending upon actual performance, results, the Incentive Compensation opportunities for fiscal year 2019 range from 0%2022 reach up to 200% of base salary for Mr. Ridge, from 0%up to 160% of base salary for Mr.  Brass, up to 100% of base salary for Messrs.Mr. Rembolt,  up to 110% of base salary for Ms. Olsem, and Brass, from 0% up to 90% of base salary for Mr. Noble,  and from 0% up to 80% of base salary for Mr. Clampitt.Ms. Kiamilev.



The maximum Incentive Compensation potential for employees under the Performance Incentive Program is referredprovides for three performance measure levels:  Levels A, B and C. Only two of the three performance measure goals are applied for NEOs to herein ascalculate earned Incentive Compensation and to provide enhanced incentives to achieve maximum Global Adjusted EBITDA results for the employee’s “Annual Opportunity.”benefit of stockholders. For each of the NEOs, the Performance Incentive Program for fiscal year 20192022 provided two performance measure levels (“Levels A(A and C”)C) for determination of earned Incentive Compensation; each level represented 50% of the maximum Incentive Compensation potential (“Annual Opportunity. The Performance Incentive Program is consistently applied for all employees of the Company except that there are three performance measure levels (“Levels A, B and C”Opportunity”) for all employees other than the NEOs and certain other executive officers and management employees.. The maximum Incentive Compensation payout for Messrs. Brass and NobleMs. Olsem required achievement of specified segment goals for Regional Adjusted EBITDA (Level A) and Company performance that equaled the maximum goal amount for Global Adjusted EBITDA as(Level C,) each described below (Level C).below. For Messrs. Ridge, Brass and Rembolt and ClampittMs. Kiamilev (each of whom has global rather than regional responsibilities), the maximum Incentive Compensation payouts required achievement of specified goals for Global Adjusted EBITDA for each of Levels A and C. 



Only two of the three performance measure goals are applied for the NEOs and certain other executive officers and management employees for purposes of calculating earned Incentive Compensation in order to provide an increased incentive to those employees to achieve the maximum level of Global EBITDA results for the benefit of stockholders.  Level B performance measure goals for other employees are more directed to achievement of goals tied to areas over which they have more direct influence. For such other employees, Level A represented 50% of the Annual Opportunity, Level B represented 30% of the Annual Opportunity and Level C represented 20% of the Annual Opportunity.

Target and maximum payout amountspayouts for each of the NEOs for the fiscal year 20192022 Performance Incentive Program are disclosed below in the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 20192022.



2025

 


 

The following table sets forth the fiscal year 2019 Performance2022 Incentive ProgramCompensation payout weightings and the minimum and maximum goals for the performance measures applicable to each of the NEOs. The minimum and maximum Level A goals for Regional Adjusted EBITDA and Global Adjusted EBITDA were based on earnings before deduction of any Incentive Compensation amounts.Compensation. The minimum and maximum Level C goals for Global Adjusted EBITDA were based on earnings after deduction of an estimate of the maximum possible Incentive Compensation amounts for Levels A and B, but before deduction of Incentive Compensation amounts for Level C.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level

 

Performance Measure

 

Garry O. Ridge
Jay W. Rembolt
Richard T. Clampitt

 

Steven A. Brass

 

William B. Noble

 

Minimum Goal
FY 2019
($ thousands)

 

Maximum Goal
FY 2019
($ thousands)

 

Performance Measure

 

Garry O. Ridge
Jay W. Rembolt
Steven A. Brass
Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

Minimum Goal
FY 2022
($ thousands)

 

Maximum Goal
FY 2022
($ thousands)

A

 

Regional  EBITDA (Americas)

 

N/A

 

50%

 

N/A

 

$            56,062

 

$            59,370

 

Regional  EBITDA (Americas)

 

N/A

 

50%

 

$                  61,041

 

$            65,914

A

 

Regional  EBITDA (EMEA)1

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

50%

 

$            38,159

 

$            41,406

 

Global  EBITDA

 

50%

 

N/A

 

$                  92,165

 

$          107,895

A

 

Global  EBITDA

 

50%

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

$            85,280

 

$            98,294

C

 

Global  EBITDA

 

50%

 

50%

 

50%

 

$            89,544

 

$            96,466

 

Global  EBITDA

 

50%

 

50%

 

$                  96,895

 

$          106,285



1

EMEA figures have been converted from Great Britain pounds sterling (“GBP”) at an average annual exchange rate for fiscal year 2019 of $1.2859 per GBP.



The following table sets forth the actual fiscal year 20192022 performance results and percentage achievement for each of the performance measuresmeasure under the Performance Incentive Program formulas applicable to the NEOs. Actual earnings results for measurement against the Regional and Global EBITDA goals were adjusted to exclude (a) Incentive Compensation amounts consistent with the manner in which the minimum and maximum performance measure goals are determined as described with reference to the table above and (b) certain Company expenditures as approved by the Committee, as described above.



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Level

 

Performance Measure

 

Actual
FY 2019
($ thousands)

 

% Achievement

A

 

Regional  EBITDA (Americas)

 

$                   56,622

 

16.9% 

A

 

Regional  EBITDA (EMEA)1

 

$                   43,933

 

100.0% 

A

 

Global  EBITDA

 

$                   99,096

 

100.0% 

C

 

Global  EBITDA

 

$                   92,011

 

35.6% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

EMEA figures have been converted from Great Britain pounds sterling (“GBP”) at an average annual exchange rate for fiscal year 2019 of $1.2859 per GBP.



 

 

 

 

 

 

Level

 

Performance Measure

 

Actual
FY 2022
($ thousands)

 

% Achievement

A

 

Regional  EBITDA (Americas)

 

$                   57,504

 

0.0%

A

 

Global  EBITDA

 

$                   96,299

 

26.3%

C

 

Global  EBITDA

 

$                   93,258

 

0.0%



Achievement of the maximum goals for Regional Adjusted EBITDA and Global Adjusted EBITDA is intended to be attainable through the concerted efforts of all management teams working in their own regions and areas of responsibility and for the Company as a whole.



Based on the Company’s fiscal year 20192022 performance and the Committee’s certification of the relative attainment of each of the performance measuresmeasure under the Performance Incentive Program, the payouts for our executive officers, including the NEOs were calculated. On October 7, 2019,10, 2022, the Committee approved payment of the following Incentive Compensation amounts to the NEOs for fiscal year 20192022 performance:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officer

 

Title

 

FY 2019
Annual
Opportunity
(As % of
Base Salary)

 

FY 2019
Incentive Compensation
Paid ($)

 

FY 2019
Actual Incentive Compensation
(As % of
Opportunity)

Garry O. Ridge

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

200% 

 

$          897,285

 

68% 

Jay W. Rembolt

 

Vice President, Finance, Treasurer

 

100% 

 

$          217,275

 

68% 



 

and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven A. Brass

 

President and Chief Operating Officer

 

100% 

 

$            95,272

 

26% 

Richard T. Clampitt

 

Vice President, General Counsel

 

80% 

 

$          152,401

 

68% 



 

and Corporate Secretary

 

 

 

 

 

 

William B. Noble1

 

Managing Director, EMEA

 

90% 

 

$          185,020

 

68% 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

EMEA figures have been converted from Great Britain pounds sterling (“GBP”) at an average annual exchange rate for fiscal year 2019 of $1.2859 per GBP.

21





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officer

 

Title

 

FY 2022
Annual
Opportunity
(As % of
Base Salary)

 

FY 2022
Incentive Compensation
Paid ($)

 

FY 2022
Actual Incentive Compensation
(As % of
Opportunity)

Garry O. Ridge

 

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

 

200% 

 

$          181,678

 

13% 

Steven A. Brass

 

President and Chief Operating Officer

 

160% 

 

$            96,091

 

13% 

Jay W. Rembolt

 

Vice President, Finance, Treasurer

 

100% 

 

$            43,992

 

13% 



 

and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

Vice President, General Counsel

 

90% 

 

$            32,001

 

13% 



 

and Corporate Secretary

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

Division President, Americas

 

110% 

 

$                     -

 

0% 



As an example of the operation ofTo illustrate how the Performance Incentive Program Mr. Rembolt’swith Levels A and C works, Ms. Kiamilev’s Incentive Compensation payoutof $32,001 for fiscal year 20192022 was generally computed as follows:



·

Incentive Compensation Annual Opportunity = 100%  X Eligible Earnings90%  x Salary ($320,357)271,625)  =  $320,357.  $244,463

·

Level A (Global(Regional Adjusted EBITDA) =  50% of Annual Opportunity = $160,178.  $122,231

—  Level A Incentive Compensation = Level A Achievement (100%(26.3%Xx Level A Annual Opportunity = $160,178.$32,001 

·

Level C (Global Adjusted EBITDA) = 50% of Annual Opportunity = $160,178.  $122,231

—  Level C Incentive Compensation = Level C Achievement (35.645%(0%Xx Level C Annual Opportunity = $57,097.  $0

·

Level A Incentive Compensation + Level C Incentive Compensation = $32,001 + $0 = $32,001

26

 

Mr. Rembolt’s aggregate Incentive Compensation payout was the sum of the payouts under Levels A and C of the Performance Incentive Program, or $217,275.


 

Equity Compensation

 

Equity compensation is a critical component of the Company’s efforts to attract and retain executives and key employees, encourage employee ownership in the Company, link pay with performance and align the interests of executive officers with those of stockholders. To provide appropriately directed incentives to our executive officers, the Committee has providedCompany grants awards of time-vesting restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards as well as performance-vesting market share unit (“MSU”) awardsRSUs, MSUs and deferred performance unit (“DPU”) awards.PSUs. Equity awards for fiscal year 20192022 were granted to the NEOs pursuant to the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”) approved by the stockholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Plan.  



The Company’s MSU awards are tied to a measure of total stockholder return (“TSR”) that is determined by reference to a change in the value of the Company’s common stock with reinvestment of dividends. In October 2018, the Committee granted2021, primary equity allocations of RSU and MSU awards for fiscal year 2019.2022 were granted. The authorized awards were divided equally between the two types of awards for each NEO.NEOs. MSU awards provide for vesting after a three year performance vestingthe measurement period, based on a comparison of the Company’s TSR against the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”) as described in more detail below. In addition to the RSU and MSU awards, the NEOs were also received DPUgranted PSU awards in October 2018. As compared2021.  Compared to the retention and long-term performance-based attributes of the RSU and MSU awards, the DPUPSU awards provide a near-term incentive reward for achieving Global EBITDA results forincentive. If the fiscal year in excess of the amount of Global EBITDA required for maximum payout of Incentive Compensation under Level C of the Performance Incentive Program as described above.  DPUapplicable performance measures are achieved, PSU awards provide for vestingvest at the end of the fiscal year for which they are granted. All RSU, MSU and DPUPSU awards are subject to terms and conditions set forth in an applicable award agreement (the “Award Agreement”).



The principal attributes and benefits of the RSU, MSU and DPUequity awards for executive officers are as follows:



·

RSU awards provide for annual vesting in relatively equal portions over a period of three years from the grant date, subject to earlier vesting upon the effective date of retirement under certain conditions.

·

MSU awards provide for performance-based vesting tied to the Company’s TSR over a performance measurement period of three fiscal years beginning with the fiscal year in which the awards are granted and ending on August 31st of the third year. The change in the value of the Company’s common stock assumes the reinvestment of dividends and compares the Company’s TSR against the Index.

·

DPUPSU awards provide for performance-based vesting tied to the Company’s Global Adjusted EBITDA achievement for the fiscal year in which the awards are granted in excess of the maximum goal for Global Adjusted EBITDA under Level C of the Company’s Performance Incentive Program.

·

RSU and MSU awards provide for the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock upon vesting.

·

Vested DPUPSU awards provide for the issuance of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock only upon vesting.  These issued shares are restricted to the extent that they may not be sold before termination of employment.  Until issuance of the shares for vested DPU awards, the holders of the vested DPU awards are entitled to receive dividend equivalent payments with respect to their vested DPU awards, payable in cash as and when dividends are declared upon shares of the Company’s common stock.

·

A mix of RSU, MSU and DPUequity awards is appropriate asmore balanced compared to RSU awards alone or other equity awards, such as stock options, for the following reasons: i)because:  (i) annual MSU awards granted annually provide a more direct performance-based incentive aligned directly with longer term stockholder interests; ii)(ii) RSU awards have a greaterhigher perceived value to recipients than stock options; iii) DPU(iii) PSU awards offer a reward for exceeding the highest goal for near-term financial results for the Company;  iv) RSU, MSU and DPU(iv) equity awards have a  less dilutive impact on a share count basistotal outstanding shares  than stock options; and v) the issuance of(v) holding shares of the Company’s common stock upon vesting of RSUs and MSUs, and the deferred issuance of shares following vesting of DPU awards(and earning dividends) encourages long-term stock ownership, promotes retention objectives and facilitates the achievement ofsupports compliance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines (as described(described below in the Other Compensation Policies section, under the heading, Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines).



The Board recognizes the potentially dilutive impact of equity awards. TheAccordingly, the Company’s equity award practices are designed to balance the impact of dilution and the Company’s need to remain competitive by recruiting, retaining, and providing incentives for high-performing employees.  

22


Restricted Stock Unit Awards

 

RSU awards provide for the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock to the award recipient upon vesting provided that the recipientemployee remains employed with the Company through eachon the applicable vesting date except(except for termination of employment due to death or disability or vesting upon retirement as noted below with respect to vesting upon retirement. Shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the portion of the RSU award that has vested are issued promptly upon the vesting date.below).  Except as otherwise noted, RSU awards provide for vestingvest annually over a period of three years from the grant date. 34% of the RSU award will vestvests on the first vesting date and 33% of the RSU award will vestvests on each of the second and third vesting dates. The vesting date each year is the third business day following the Company’s public release of its annual earnings for the preceding fiscal year, but not later than November 15 of the vesting year.15.



RSU Award Agreements provide that for RSU award recipientsemployees who retire from the Company after reaching age 65, or for RSU award recipientsemployees who retire from the Company after reaching age 55 and have been employed by the Company for at least 10 years, all RSUs will be vestedvest upon the effective date of retirement. 

Shares for RSU awards granted prior to fiscal year 2021 that vest due to death, disability or retirement and shares will be issued within 30 days after the effective date of retirement,termination of employment, except for specified employees, including the Company’s executive officers, whose RSU shares will be issued no earlier than 6 months after the effective date of retirement.separation from service or termination of employment due to disability. For shares of RSU awards granted starting in fiscal year 2022, RSU shares will be issued no earlier than 6 months after the effective date of separation of service, which policy shall apply to every employee.  

27


 



Payment of required withholding taxes due with respect to the vesting of the RSU awards if any, will be covered through withholding of shares by the Company. The Company will issue a net number of shares to the recipient for a vested RSU awardshares after withholding shares having a value as of the vesting date, or as of the date of issuance in the case of the issuance of RSU shares followingdeath, disability or retirement, equal to the required tax withholding obligation.



Market Share Unit or MSU Awards

 

MSU awards provide for performance-based vesting over a performance measurement period of three fiscal years commencing with the fiscal year in which the MSU awards are granted (the “Measurement“MSU Measurement Period”). Except as noted below with respect to vesting upon death, disability or retirement, the recipientemployees must remain employed with the Company for vesting purposes until the date on which the Committee certifies achievement of the requisite performance provided for in the MSU Award Agreement. A number of sharesShares of the Company’s common stock equal to an “Applicable Percentage” of the “Target Number” of shares covered by the MSU awards to the NEOs will be issued as ofon the “Settlement Date.”Settlement Date (defined below). The Applicable Percentage is determined by reference to the performance vesting provisions of the MSU Award Agreements as described below. The Settlement Date for an MSU award is the third business day following the Company’s public release of its annual earnings for the third fiscal year of the MSU Measurement Period.



MSU Award Agreements provide for monthly pro-rata vesting of MSUs as of the end of the MSU Measurement Period in the event of the earlier termination of the award recipient’s employment due to death, disability, or retirement after reaching age 65, or retirement after reaching age 55 with at least 10 years of employment with the Company.  For purposes of calculatingTo calculate the number of MSUs vested and the corresponding number of shares to be issued as ofon the Settlement Date, the Target Number of shares covered by the MSU awards will be adjusted according to the pro-rata portion of the Measurement Period that has elapsed as of the effective date of termination of employment. The Committee may also exercise its discretion to provide for monthly pro-rata vesting of MSUs awarded to a recipientan employee who resigns or is terminated by the Company for reasons other than good cause.



Payment of required withholding taxes due with respect to the settlement of an MSU award, if any, will be covered through withholding of shares by the Company. The Company will issue a net number of shares to the recipient for a vested MSU awardshares after withholding shares having a value as ofon the Settlement Date equal to the required tax withholding obligation.



The performance vesting provisions of MSU awards are based on relative TSR for the Company over the MSU Measurement Period as compared to the total return (“Return”) for the Index as reported for total return (with dividends reinvested), as published by Russell Investments. For purposes of computingTo compute the relative TSR for the Company as compared to the Return for the Index, dividends paid with respect to the Shares will be treated as having been reinvested as of the ex-dividend date for each declared dividend.



23


The Applicable Percentage of the Target Number of shares will be determined for each of the NEOs based on the absolute percentage point difference between the TSR for the Company as compared to the Return for the Index (the “Relative TSR”) as set forth in the table below: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Relative TSR

 

 

 

 

(absolute percentage point difference)

 

Applicable Percentage

 

Applicable Percentage

> 20%

 

200%*

20%

 

200%*

≥ 20%

 

200%

15%

 

175%*

 

175%

10%

 

150%

 

150%

5%

 

125%

 

125%

Equal

 

100%

 

100%

-5%

 

  75%

 

  75%

-10%

 

  50%

 

  50%

>-10%

 

    0%

 

    0%

 

 

 

 

*  The MSU award granted to Mr. Brass in fiscal year 2017 provides for a maximum Applicable Percentage of the Target Number of shares of 150% if the Relative TSR is 10% or greater. Otherwise, the Applicable Percentage for the MSU awards granted to Mr. Brass will be calculated in the same manner as for the other NEOs.



The Applicable Percentage will be determined on a straight linestraight-line sliding scale from the minimum 50% Applicable Percentage achievement level to the maximum 200% Applicable Percentage achievement level (150% for Mr. Brass for the MSU award granted in fiscal year 2017). For purposes of determininglevel.  To determine the TSR for the Company and the Return for the Index, the beginning and ending values for each measure will be determined on anby taking the average basis over a period ofclosing price on all market trading days within the ninety (90) calendar days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year for the beginning of the MSU Measurement Period and over a period of all market trading days within the ninety (90) calendar days prior to the end of the third fiscal year of the MSU Measurement Period. For purposes of determining relative achievement, actual results are to be rounded to the nearest tenth of one percent and rounded up from the midpoint. The number of MSU Shares to be issued on the Settlement Date is to be rounded to the nearest whole share and rounded upward from the midpoint. 



In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan), the MSU Measurement Period will end as of the effective date of the Change in Control and the ending values for calculating the TSR for the Company and the Return for the Index will be determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock and the value of the Index, respectively, immediately prior to the effective date of the Change in Control. The Applicable Percentage will be applied to a proportionate amount of the Target Number of MSUs based on the portion of the Measurement Period elapsed as of the effective date of the

28


Change in Control. The recipient NEO will receive RSUs for the portion of the Target Number of MSUs to which the Applicable Percentage is not applied. Those RSUs will time vest, subject to rights under the NEO’s Change of Control Severance Agreement, as of the Settlement Date.



Deferred Performance Share Unit or PSU Awards

 

DPUPSU awards provide for performance-based vesting over a performance measurement period of the fiscal year in which the DPUPSU awards are granted (the “Measurement“PSU Measurement Year”). The DPUPSU awards provide for vesting of a number of DPUsPSUs equal to an “Applicable Percentage” of the “Maximum Number” of DPUsPSUs awarded to the NEOs followingas of the conclusion of the Measurement Year (“Vested DPUs”). Except as noted below with respect to vesting upon retirement, the recipient must remain employed with the Company for vesting purposes until August 31 of thePSU Measurement Year. Except as noted below as to non-residents of the United States, the Vested DPUs must be held until termination of employment. Following termination of employment, each Vested DPU will be settled by issuance of one share of the Company’s common stock (a “DPU Share”). The Maximum Number of DPUs refers to the maximum number of DPU Shares that may be issued with respect to a DPU award upon full achievement of the applicable performance goal as described below. The Applicable Percentage is determined by reference to the performance vesting provisions of the DPUPSU Award Agreement as described below. For NEOs who are not residents of the United States, the Compensation Committee has discretion to either defer settlement of each Vested DPU by issuance of a DPU Share following termination of employment or settle each Vested DPU in cash by immediate payment of an amount equal to the closing price of one shareRestricted shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the number of vested PSUs will be issued as of the date“Settlement Date.” The restricted shares issued upon vesting of the Compensation Committee’s certificationPSUs will be subject to a restrictive endorsement and may not be sold before termination of achievementemployment. The Settlement Date for vested PSU awards is the third business day following the Company’s public release of its annual earnings for the performance measure applied in determination of the Applicable Percentage.PSU Measurement Year.



Each Vested DPU that is not settled in cash will include the right to receive a dividend equivalent payment in an amount equal to the dividends declared with respect to the Company’s common stock for each Vested DPU. Such dividend equivalent payments are to be paid in cash as ordinary compensation income as and when common stock dividends are paid by the Company, provided,

24


however, that the Company may elect to accumulate such dividend equivalent payments for later payment not less often than annually.

DPU Award Agreements provide for monthly pro-rata vesting of DPUsPSUs as of the end of the PSU Measurement Year in the event of the earlier termination of the award recipient’s employment due to death, disability, or retirement after reaching age 65, or retirement after reaching age 55 with at least 10 years of employment with the Company.  For purposes of calculatingTo calculate the number of Vested DPUs earned,shares to be issued upon vesting of the PSUs, the Maximum Number of shares covered by the DPUPSU awards will be adjusted according to the pro-rata portion of the PSU Measurement Year that has elapsed as of the effective date of termination of employment.



Vested DPUs not otherwise settled in cash will be settled by issuance of the DPU Shares as of 6 months following termination of employment (the “Settlement Date”). Payment of required withholding taxes due with respect to the settlement of a Vested DPUany vested PSU award if any, will be covered through withholding of shares by the Company. The Company will issue a net number of PSU shares to the recipient for a Vested DPU award after withholding shares having a value as of the Settlement Date equal to the required tax withholding obligation.



The performance vesting provisions of the DPUsPSUs are based on relative achievement within an established performance measure range of the Company’s Global Adjusted EBITDA (before deduction of the stock-based compensation expense for the Vested DPUs and excluding other non-operating income and expense amounts (“Adjusted Global EBITDA”) for thePSU Measurement Year.



For fiscal year 2019,2022, the established performance vesting provisionstargets for the DPUs were established asPSUs to vest are set forth in the table below:





 

 



 

 

Adjusted Global EBITDA1

 

Applicable Percentage

 > $96,908,000

 

100%

    $96,908,000

 

100%

    $92,343,000

 

  5%

 < $92,343,000

 

  0%

      $92,102,000*

 

  0%

      *      Implied zero percentage achievement level.

 

 



 

 

1

The calculation of Adjusted Global EBITDA for purposes of the performance vesting provisions of the DPUs accounts for full payment of all Incentive Compensation earned for the fiscal year. 



 

 



 

 

Global Adjusted EBITDA

 

Applicable Percentage

≥ $108,762,000

 

100%

  $102,500,000

 

5%

< $102,500,000

 

0%



TheIf Global Adjusted EBITDA exceeds the performance target set at 5%, then the Applicable Percentage will beis determined on a straight line sliding scalestraight-line basis from the implied zero percentage achievement level of $102,170,000 to the maximum 100% Applicable Percentage achievement level, but the Applicable Percentage shall not be less than 5%exceed 100%. For purposes of determining the Applicable Percentage, the calculated percentage is to be rounded to the nearest tenth of one percent and rounded upward from the midpoint. The number of Vested DPUs is to be rounded to the nearest whole unit and rounded upward from the midpoint.



Equity AwardsEQUITY AWARDSFiscal Year 2019FISCAL YEAR 2022



For fiscal year 2019,2022, equity awards to our executive officers were generally granted to satisfy goals for executive officer retention, to provide incentives for current and future performance, and to meet objectives for overall levels of compensation and pay mix. RSU, MSU and DPUEquity awards were granted to the NEOs by the Committee in October 2018. All of the equity awards2021 and March 2022 are set forth below in the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 20192022. In establishing award levels for the NEOs in October 2021 for fiscal year 2019,2022, the Committee placed emphasis on long-term retention goals and desired incentives for current and future contributions. The RSU and MSU awards in October 2021 to our CEO were, consistent with past practice, larger than the awards to the other NEOs in recognition of his higher level of responsibility for overall Company performance and based upon market data that supports a higher level of equity compensation for our CEO. The specific RSU award amountsawards and Target Number of shares covered by MSU awards were determined for each NEO based on an assessment of the NEO’s achievement of individual performance goals as well as Company performance for fiscal year 20182021 in areas over which the NEO had particular influence. The DPU award amountsgrant of RSUs to the CEO in March 2022 is discussed in the Executive Compensation section under the heading, “Summary of Transition and Release Agreement with Garry O. Ridge.” The PSU awards were established by reference to each NEO’s Incentive Compensation opportunity amount based on fiscal year 20182021 base salary amounts and fiscal year 20192022 maximum percentage opportunity for Incentive Compensation opportunity; the share equivalent value of the DPUsPSUs awarded to each NEONEOs as of the date of grant equals 50% of the NEO’s maximum Incentive Compensation opportunity amount.opportunity.  



Market Share Unit or MSU Award Vesting for Three Fiscal Year Performance Achievement



On October 7,  2019,10,  2022, the Committee certified achievement ofreviewed the performance measure applicable to MSU awards granted to the NEOs in October 2016.2019. The Committee certifiedassessed the Company’s relative TSR as compared to the Return for the Index for the performance

29


Measurement Period ended August 31, 2019 for purposes of calculating2022 to calculate the vested number of shares of the Company’s common stock for those MSU awards.awards vesting, if any. The relative TSR as compared to the Return for the Index (as an absolute

25


percentage point difference) over the three fiscal year Measurement Period ending August 31, 20192022 was 22.4%.10.9% lower. As a result, based on the table above in the description of the MSU awards, the Committee certified that the Applicable Percentage of the Target Number of shares underlying the MSU awards granted in October 20162019 was 200%0%  for each of the NEOs other than Mr. Brass, and 150% for Mr. Brass.NEOs.



The following table sets forth the Target Number and vested number of shares underlying the MSU awards granted to each NEO in October 2016:2019, none of which vested and were forfeited: 





 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Executive Officer

 

Target Number

 

Vested Shares

Garry O. Ridge

 

4,250 

 

8,500 

Jay W. Rembolt

 

782 

 

1,564 

Steven A. Brass

 

783 

 

1,175 

Richard T. Clampitt

 

671 

 

1,342 

William B. Noble

 

492 

 

984 



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officer

Target Number

Vested Shares

Garry O. Ridge

4,295

-

Steven A. Brass

1,745

-

Jay W. Rembolt

805

-

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 -

-

Patricia Q. Olsem

698

-

Deferred

Performance Share Unit or PSU Award Vesting for Fiscal Year 20192022 Performance Achievement



DPUPSU awards granted to the NEOs for fiscal year 2019 lapsedin October 2021 as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 2022 table below did not vest and were forfeited without any value to the NEOs. Vesting of the DPUs would have required a level ofThe Company’s Global Adjusted Global EBITDA equal to or greater than $92,343,000  (the minimum Adjusted Global EBITDA goal for DPU vesting as set forth(as described above in the table on the preceding page). Since the actual Adjusted Global EBITDAdescription of PSU awards), which was $93,133,000 for fiscal year 20192022, was less than $92,343,000,  the DPUs did not vest and they have lapsed.attained as required for vesting.



BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES



As is the case with most Company employees, theThe NEOs are provided with standard health and welfare benefits and for the NEOs other than Mr. Noble, the opportunity to participate in the WD-40 Company Profit Sharing/Company’s 401(k) Plan, (the “Plan”).similar to those generally offered to other Company employees. The Plan serves to provide our executive officers, including the eligible NEOs, with tax-advantaged retirement savings as an additional component of overall compensation. Employees have the right to invest the Company’s contributions to the Plan in shares of the Company’s common stock as an alternative to other investment choices available under the Plan. For Mr. Noble, the Company provides compensation in lieu of contributions to a local retirement program for which he is eligible due to unfavorable taxation applicable to such contributions.



The Company maintains individual Supplemental Death Benefit Plan agreements for both Mr.Messrs. Ridge and Mr. Rembolt.Rembolt, and such agreements will terminate once they are no longer employees as of January 2, 2023 and January 6, 2023, respectively. The Company’s Supplemental Death Benefit Plan agreement obligations under these agreements are funded by life insurance policies owned by the Company.



The Company also provides leased vehicles or a vehicle allowance to its executive officers and private health insurance for Mr. Noble in excess of coverage available to other Company employees in the United Kingdom.officers. The costs associated with the perquisites and other personal benefits provided to the NEOs are included in the Summary Compensation Table below and they are separately identified for fiscal year 20192022 in the footnote disclosure of such perquisites and other personal benefits included with the Summary Compensation Table.benefits.



The Committee considers the cost of the foregoing health and welfare benefits and perquisites in connection with its approval of the total compensation package for each of our NEOs. All such costs are considered appropriate in support of the Committee’s objective of attracting and retaining high quality executive officers because they are common forms of compensation for seniorbenefits and perquisites offered to executives, who expect and are expected by such executives when they considercompare them to competing compensation packages.  



POST-EMPLOYMENT OBLIGATIONS



The Company has change of control severance agreements with each of the NEOs. The specific terms of the agreements are described in detail below under the heading, Change of Control Severance Agreements. In establishing the terms and conditions for the change of control severancethese agreements, consideration was given to possible inclusion ofincluding severance compensation to be paid to the executive officers in the event of their termination of employment without cause (or for good reason) without regard to the existence of a change of control of the Company. No such provisions were included, and severance compensation is payable only following a “double-trigger”:  termination of employment without “cause” or for “good reason” within two years following a “change of control” of the Company (as the quoted terms are defined in the severancethese agreements).



The Committee believes that the change of control severance agreements help ensure the best interests of stockholders by fostering continuous employment of key management personnel. As is the case in many public companies, the possibility of an unsolicited change of control exists. The uncertainty among management that can arise from a possible change of control can

26


result in the untimely departure or distraction of key executive officers. Reasonable change of control severance agreements reinforce continued attention and dedication of executive officers to their assigned duties and support the Committee’s objective of retaining high quality executives.

 

OVERALL REASONABLENESS OF COMPENSATION

The Committee believes that the Company is achieving its compensation objectives and, in particular, rewards executive officers for driving operational success and stockholder value creation. Based on reviews of tally sheets and a “pay-for-performance” analysis by the Committee, and in light of the Company’s compensation objectives, the Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the pay mix and target pay position relative to market for each of the NEOs are reasonable and appropriate. The “pay-for-performance” analysis includes a review of the individual components of executive officer compensation that are tied to Company performance, as measured by identified financial performance metrics as well as the price of the Company’s common stock. In particular, the Committee reviews executive officer Incentive Compensation to determine whether it appropriately rewards achievement of specific financial performance goals and does not otherwise provide rewards in the absence of reasonable measures of individual and Company success. Similarly, with respect to equity awards, the Committee considers the effectiveness of such awards in providing a reasonable incentive to the executive officers to increase profits (as measured by Regional and Global EBITDA) and total stockholder return without inappropriately rewarding the executive officers if performance targets are not achieved over the long term.

The following table sets forth the total compensation for each of our NEOs (based on cash compensation received as base salary and earned Incentive Compensation, plus the value of equity awards (other than the DPUs) at their date of grant per share values) for fiscal year 2019, together with the relative market percentile for each NEO:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officer

 

Base Salary

 

Annual
Earned Incentive Compensation

 

Value of
Stock Awards1

 

Total
Compensation

 

Present Value of Total Compensation Received as a Percentage of Market Median

 

Garry O. Ridge

 

$        662,000

 

$        897,285

 

$     1,299,727

 

$     2,859,012

 

93% 

 

Jay W. Rembolt

 

$        320,599

 

$        217,275

 

$        274,980

 

$        812,854

 

94% 

 

Steven A. Brass

 

$        365,937

 

$          95,272

 

$        199,808

 

$        661,017

 

40% 

 

Richard T. Clampitt

 

$        281,094

 

$        152,401

 

$        149,693

 

$        583,188

 

77% 

 

William B. Noble2

 

$        303,112

 

$        185,020

 

$        149,693

 

$        637,825

 

93% 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

For purposes of comparing total compensation for fiscal year 2019 to market median compensation levels for each NEO, the Committee included the Value of Stock Awards (RSUs and MSUs) based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date for those awards.  The October 8, 2018 grant date closing price was $162.71.  MSUs are valued based on the target number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued upon achievement of the applicable performance measure. Information concerning all of the Stock Awards (including DPUs) for fiscal year 2019 is set forth below in the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 2019

2

Mr. Noble’s salary and Incentive Compensation amounts have been converted from Great Britain pounds sterling (“GBP”) at an average annual exchange rate for fiscal year 2019 of $1.2859 per GBP.

For fiscal year 2019, total compensation for our NEOs was assessed by the Committee’s compensation consulting firm as part of the process for executive compensation decision-making for fiscal year 2020. As noted in the table above, total compensation for the NEOs ranged from 40%  to 94%  of the market median compensation level for each position as determined by the Committee’s compensation consulting firm. The levels of compensation are considered by the Committee to be in line with target compensation levels for the NEOs in a year in which the Company’s  EMEA, Asia-Pacific and global performance was strong. These market position comparisons are based on an analysis from the Committee’s compensation consultant which incorporates updated peer group proxy analysis and general industry survey data for current NEO roles.

2730

 


 

OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES

 

EXCHANGE ACT RULE 10b5-1 TRADING PLANS AND INSIDER TRADING GUIDELINES



The Company maintains insider trading guidelines, including transaction pre-approval requirements, applicable to our officers and directors required to report changes in beneficial ownership under Section 16A description of the Exchange Act as well as certain other employees who have significant management or financial reporting responsibilities and can be expected to have access to material non-public information concerning the Company. These insider trading guidelines also require pre-approval of all trading plans adopted pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act. To avoid the potential for abuse, the Company’s policy with respect to such trading plans is that, once adopted, trading plans are not subject to change or cancellation. Any such change or cancellation of an approved trading plan by an executive officer, director or employee covered by the Company’s insider trading guidelinespolicies applicable to our executive officers is included above in violation of the policy will result in the Company’s refusal to approve future trading plan requests for that person.  this Proxy Statement under Insider Trading Policy – Prohibited Hedging Transactions



EXECUTIVE OFFICER STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

 

The Board of Directors has approved guidelines for executive officer ownership of the Company’s common stock. The guidelines specify that each executive officer will be expected to attain, within a period of five years from the later of the date of electionappointment of the executive officer or the date of adoption of the guidelines, and to maintain thereafter, equity ownership in the Company valued at not less than one times his or her current base salary for executive officers other than our CEO and CFO, two times the current base salary for our CFO, and five times the current base salary for our CEO. Valuation for purposes of the guidelines is to be determined at the higher of cost or current fair market value for shares of the Company’s common stock held outright and, if applicable, shares underlying vested RSUs, MSUs and DPUs then held.equity awards held by the executive officers.  



The Board of Directors believes that the stock ownership guidelines serve to improve alignment of the interests of our executive officers and the Company’s stockholders. AtAs of October 17, 2022, all NEOs comply with the present time, all of the NEOs have exceeded the expected levelestablished guidelines of stock ownership.

As noted above under the heading Equity Compensation, the NEOs receive both time-vesting RSU awards and performance-based vesting MSU and DPU awards. As the RSU and MSU awards vest, shares of the Company’s common stock are issued to the NEOs and these shares may then be sold or retained, subject to the stock ownership guidelines described above. Vested DPU awards provide for deferred issuance of shares to the NEOs upon termination of employment.  Outstanding unvested RSU and MSU awards held as of August 31, 2019 by the NEOs are set forth in the table below under the heading, Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year End. All of the NEOs hold Vested DPUs and Mr. Ridge and Mr. Noble hold vested RSU awards that must be retained until termination of employment as noted above in the footnotes to the tables under the heading, Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers.    



TAX CONSIDERATIONS



Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) limits the deductibility of compensation payable in any tax year to certain covered executive officers. Section 162(m) of the Code generally provides that a company covered by the statute cannot deduct compensation paid to its most highly paid executive officers to the extent that such compensation exceeds $1 million per officer per taxable year. Under the law prior to the passage of the legislation known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) compensation that is “performance-based” within the meaning of the Code did not count toward the $1 million limit. The performance-based compensation exception to the deductibility limit was repealed by the Act.  However, under a transition rule provided for in the Act, the value of vested shares under MSU awards granted prior to November 2, 2017 is still expected to qualify for deductibility under the performance-based compensation exception.  



While the Compensation Committee will always seek to maximize the deductibility of compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers, the Committee provides total compensation to the executive officers in line with competitive practice, the Company’s compensation philosophy, and the interests of stockholders. Therefore, the Company presently pays some compensation to its executive officers that may not be deductible under Section 162(m) and it is anticipated that the Company will continue to do so.  



ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS



We follow Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”) for our stock-based compensation awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including restricted stock awards and performance-based awards, based on the grant date fair value of these awards. Depending upon the type of performance conditions applicable to performance-based awards, ASC Topic 718 may require the recording of compensation expense over the service period for the award (usually, the vesting period) based on the grant date value (such as for our MSUs) or compensation expense may be recorded based on the

28


expected probability of vesting over the vesting period, subject to adjustment as such probability may vary from period to period (such as for our DPUs)PSUs). This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and amounts reported in the compensation tables below are based on the compensation expense expected to be recorded over the vesting periods for the awards, determined as of the grant date for the awards. In the case of our MSUs, the grant date values fix the compensation expense to be recorded over the vesting period. These amounts are reported in the tables below even though our executive officers may realize more or less value from their MSU awards depending upon the actual level of achievement of the applicable performance measure. In the case of our DPUs,PSUs, no value is included in the Summary Compensation Table or in the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards – Fiscal Year 20192022, because ASC Topic 718 requires that we assess the probability of vesting of the DPUsPSUs as of the grant date. As of the grant date, we did not consider it probable that the DPUsPSUs would become vested even though it was possible that our executive officers would receive Vested DPUs asshares upon vesting of the PSUs following the end of the fiscal year.year upon achievement of the applicable performance measure.

31






COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT



The Compensation Committee of WD-40 Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has reviewed and discussed with management of the Company the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement and the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2019,2022, and, based upon that review and discussion, recommended to the boardBoard that it be so included.

Compensation Committee

Gregory A. SandfortAnne G. Saunders (Chair)

Melissa Claassen

Linda A. Lang (retiring director) Lara L. Lee

David B. Pendarvis

Neal E. SchmaleGregory A. Sandfort





SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION



Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of the Company’s stock, to file with the Securities Exchange Commission initial reports of stock ownership and reports of changes in stock ownership. Reporting persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company during the last fiscal year and written representations that no other reports were required, except as described below, all Section 16(a) requirements were complied with by all persons required to report with respect to the Company’s equity securities during the last fiscal year.  

OnAs August 6, 2019, Patricia Q. Olsem filed a report on Form 3 to report her stock ownership as of June 18, 2019, the date Ms. Olsem was designated as an executive officer.  

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

None31, 2022, none of our executive officers has an employment agreement or other arrangement, whether written or unwritten, providing for a term of employment or compensation for services rendered other than under specific arrangements, plans or programs described herein.



For fiscal year 2019,2022, our executive officers received a base salary amount. Base salary amounts for the NEOs were established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at the beginning of the fiscal year. In addition, each employee of the Company, including each executive officer, may receive Incentive Compensation under a Performance Incentive Program established at the beginning of the fiscal year by the Company and, for our executive officers, by the Committee. A complete description of the Performance Incentive Program is provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement under the heading, Performance Incentive Program. Information regarding the target and maximum potential Incentive Compensation payable under the Performance Incentive Program for fiscal year 2019 is provided below in the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 2019. The actual payouts under the Performance Incentive Program for fiscal year 2019 and further details regarding the program are provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.  Our executive officers also received equity compensation in the form of RSUs, MSUs and DPUs, and other compensation benefits for services rendered in fiscal year 20192022 as more fully described and reported in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section of this Proxy Statement and in the compensation tables below. As a relative share of reported totalTotal cash compensation for fiscal year 2019,2022,  comprised of annual salary and earned Incentive Compensation, was 51%25% of total compensation for our CEO and from 58%38%  to 67%47% of total compensation for the other NEOs. 

29




SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table shows information for the three fiscal years ended August 31, 2019,2022, August 31, 2018,2021, and August 31, 2017,2020 concerning the compensation of our CEO, our CFO and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO and CFO as of the end of fiscal year 20192022 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

 

Stock Awards1

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation2

 

All Other
Compensation3

 

Total

Name and Principal Position(s)

 

Year

 

Salary

 

Bonus

 

Stock Awards1

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation2

 

All Other
Compensation3

 

Total

Garry O. Ridge

 

2019

 

$    662,000 

 

$    1,405,209 

 

$    897,285 

 

$    115,347 

 

$       3,079,841 

 

2022

 

$          692,121 

 

$              - 

 

$    2,621,233 

 

$        181,678 

 

$        137,381 

 

$    3,632,413 

Chief Executive Officer

 

2018

 

648,840 

 

975,657 

 

698,111 

 

107,384 

 

2,429,992 

 

2021

 

$          675,240 

 

$              - 

 

$    1,574,584 

 

$     1,350,480 

 

$        129,584 

 

$    3,729,888 

and Chairman of the Board

 

2020

 

$          675,240 

 

$   196,718 

 

$    1,775,853 

 

$        140,647 

 

$        119,403 

 

$    2,907,861 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven A. Brass

 

2022

 

$          457,583 

 

$              - 

 

$       825,029 

 

$          96,091 

 

$        101,180 

 

$    1,479,882 

President and Chief Operating Officer

 

2021

 

$          446,422 

 

$              - 

 

$       787,292 

 

$        714,275 

 

$          97,156 

 

$    2,045,145 

 

2017

 

642,416 

 

894,031 

 

710,091 

 

105,791 

 

2,352,329 

 

2020

 

$          446,422 

 

$   103,727 

 

$       721,505 

 

$          74,161 

 

$          96,810 

 

$    1,442,625 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jay W. Rembolt

 

2019

 

$    320,599 

 

$       297,297 

 

$    217,275 

 

$      98,645 

 

$          933,816 

 

2022

 

$          335,186 

 

$              - 

 

$       360,772 

 

$          43,992 

 

$        108,469 

 

$       848,419 

Vice President, Finance,

 

2018

 

314,313 

 

175,592 

 

198,874 

 

91,064 

 

779,843 

 

2021

 

$          327,011 

 

$              - 

 

$       295,136 

 

$        327,011 

 

$        106,787 

 

$    1,055,945 

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

 

2017

 

308,664 

 

164,502 

 

227,454 

 

88,153 

 

788,773 

 

2020

 

$          327,011 

 

$     47,634 

 

$       332,844 

 

$          34,037 

 

$        101,178 

 

$       842,704 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven A. Brass

 

2019

 

$    365,937 

 

$       216,024 

 

$      95,272 

 

$      92,651 

 

$          769,884 

President and Chief Operating Officer

 

2018

 

312,476 

 

190,114 

 

197,365 

 

85,181 

 

785,136 

 

2017

 

291,000 

 

146,342 

 

66,816 

 

68,684 

 

572,842 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Richard T. Clampitt

 

2019

 

$    281,094 

 

$       161,842 

 

$    152,401 

 

$      83,058 

 

$          678,395 

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

2022

 

$          271,625 

 

$              - 

 

$       262,984 

 

$          32,001 

 

$          90,355 

 

$       656,965 

Vice President, General Counsel

 

2018

 

275,582 

 

146,327 

 

139,060 

 

75,632 

 

636,601 

 

2021

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

and Corporate Secretary

 

2017

 

245,854 

 

141,152 

 

144,725 

 

64,270 

 

596,001 

 

2020

��

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William B. Noble4

 

2019

 

$    303,112 

 

$       161,842 

 

$    185,020 

 

$      80,786 

 

$          730,760 

Managing Director, EMEA

 

2018

 

311,405 

 

112,000 

 

37,310 

 

98,392 

 

559,107 

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

2022

 

$          330,413 

 

$              - 

 

$       360,772 

 

$                    - 

 

$        104,654 

 

$       795,839 

Division President, Americas

 

2021

 

$          300,375 

 

$              - 

 

$       344,391 

 

$        294,072 

 

$          95,166 

 

$    1,034,004 

 

2017

 

282,560 

 

103,497 

 

166,574 

 

97,096 

 

649,727 

 

2020

 

$          300,375 

 

$              - 

 

$       288,602 

 

$        104,419 

 

$          96,630 

 

$       790,026 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32


 

1

Stock Awards other than DPUsPSUs for fiscal year 2022 and deferred performance units (“DPUs”) for fiscal years 2019, 2018,2021 and 20172020 are reported at their grant date fair values. Grant date fair value assumptions and related information is set forth in Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under the subsection “Stock-based Compensation” and Note 14, Stock-based Compensation, to the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K filed on October 22, 2019.24, 2022. Stock Awards consisting of MSUs awarded in fiscal years 2019, 2018,2022,  2021, and 20172020 are included based on the value of 100% of the target number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued upon achievement of the applicable performance measure. Stock Awards consisting of PSUs awarded for fiscal year 2022 and 2021 and DPUs awarded infor fiscal years 2019, 2018,  and 2017year 2020 are reported as having no value under applicable disclosure rules and ASC Topic 718 due to the lack of any expected probability of vesting of the PSUs and DPUs as of thetheir respective grant date,dates, as discussed above in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section under the heading, Accounting Considerations.Considerations. For achievement of the highest level of the applicable performance measure for the MSUs granted in fiscal year 2020, the NEOs other than Mr. Brass for awards granted in fiscal year 2017, willMs. Olsem receive 200% of the target number of shares, and Ms. Olsem receives 150% of the target number of shares. For achievement ofSince the highest level of the applicable performance measure for the MSUs awarded to Mr. Brass forPSUs granted in fiscal year 2017, he will2022 was not achieved, NEOs did not receive 150%any such PSUs and they were forfeited. Stock Awards in fiscal year 2022 for Mr. Ridge includes an award of the target number5,347 RSUs in March 2022 in addition to an award of shares. For achievement of the highest level of the applicable performance measure for the DPUs, NEOs would receive Vested DPUs covering the maximum number of shares reported for purposes of the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards – Fiscal Year 2019 and as described above3,476 RSUs in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section under the heading, Equity CompensationOctober 2021.    

30


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE (footnote 1 continued)



The following table sets forth the amounts that would have been included for the Stock Awards for fiscal years 2019, 2018,2022,  2021, and 20172020 for each of the NEOs ifbased on the grant date fair values for the MSUs had been based onand the maximum number of shares targeted to be received and ifunder MSU, PSU and/or DPU award agreements. PSUs were granted starting in fiscal year 2021 because the valueCompany discontinued grants of the DPUs were included at their grant date fair values based on the maximum number of shares covered by the DPUs:after fiscal year 2020.    





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Executive Officer

 

Year

 

RSUs

 

MSUs
(Maximum)

 

DPUs
(Maximum)

 

Total Stock Awards



Garry O. Ridge

 

2019

 

$

630,133 

 

$

1,550,151 

 

$

639,395 

 

$

2,819,679 



 

 

2018

 

 

480,424 

 

 

990,467 

 

 

535,878 

 

 

2,006,769 



 

 

2017

 

 

460,913 

 

 

866,235 

 

 

476,883 

 

 

1,804,031 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Jay W. Rembolt

 

2019

 

$

133,316 

 

$

327,961 

 

$

154,757 

 

$

616,034 



 

 

2018

 

 

86,463 

 

 

178,257 

 

 

151,369 

 

 

416,089 



 

 

2017

 

 

84,808 

 

 

159,387 

 

 

152,766 

 

 

396,961 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Steven A. Brass

 

2019

 

$

96,871 

 

$

238,306 

 

$

153,955 

 

$

489,132 



 

 

2018

 

 

93,614 

 

 

193,000 

 

 

142,739 

 

 

429,353 



 

 

2017

 

 

84,321 

 

 

93,072 

 

 

143,038 

 

 

320,431 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Richard T. Clampitt

 

2019

 

$

72,574 

 

$

178,535 

 

$

108,570 

 

$

359,679 



 

 

2018

 

 

72,053 

 

 

148,548 

 

 

96,487 

 

 

317,088 



 

 

2017

 

 

72,770 

 

 

136,763 

 

 

92,700 

 

 

302,233 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



William B. Noble

 

2019

 

$

72,574 

 

$

178,535 

 

$

138,079 

 

$

389,188 



 

 

2018

 

 

55,150 

 

 

113,700 

 

 

124,703 

 

 

293,553 



 

 

2017

 

 

53,357 

 

 

100,279 

 

 

127,877 

 

 

281,513 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officer

 

Year

 

RSUs

 

MSUs
(Maximum)

 

PSUs/DPUs
(Maximum)

 

Total Stock Awards

Garry O. Ridge

 

2022

 

$          1,751,225 

 

$        1,740,016 

 

$           666,722 

 

$        4,157,963 



 

2021

 

$             778,661 

 

$        1,591,847 

 

$           666,004 

 

$        3,036,512 



 

2020

 

$             776,364 

 

$        1,998,979 

 

$           652,585 

 

$        3,427,928 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven A. Brass

 

2022

 

$             390,025 

 

$           870,008 

 

$           352,449 

 

$        1,612,482 



 

2021

 

$             389,330 

 

$           795,923 

 

$           352,160 

 

$        1,537,413 



 

2020

 

$             315,426 

 

$           812,158 

 

$           317,112 

 

$        1,444,696 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jay W. Rembolt

 

2022

 

$             170,552 

 

$           380,441 

 

$           161,340 

 

$           712,333 



 

2021

 

$             145,950 

 

$           298,372 

 

$           161,168 

 

$           605,490 



 

2020

 

$             145,512 

 

$           374,663 

 

$           157,913 

 

$           678,088 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

2022

 

$             124,323 

 

$           277,321 

 

$           117,710 

 

$           519,354 



 

2021

 

$                        - 

 

$                       - 

 

$                       - 

 

$                       - 



 

2020

 

$                        - 

 

$                       - 

 

$                       - 

 

$                       - 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

2022

 

$             170,552 

 

$           380,441 

 

$           162,931 

 

$           713,924 



 

2021

 

$             170,308 

 

$           348,167 

 

$           162,946 

 

$           681,421 



 

2020

 

$             126,170 

 

$           324,863 

 

$           131,472 

 

$           582,505 



2

Amounts reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation represent Incentive Compensation payouts under the Company’s Performance Incentive Program as described in the narrative preceding the Summary Compensation Table and in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section of this Proxy Statement. Threshold, target and maximum payouts for each of the NEOs for fiscal year 20192022 are set forth below in the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 2019.  2022.  

3

All Other Compensation for each of the NEOs includes the following items: (i) perquisites and benefits described below; (ii) employer profit sharing and matching contributions to the Company’s 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan for each NEO other than Mr. Noble, and a U.K. employer retirement benefit contribution for Mr. Noble in fiscal years 2017 and 2018 (“Retirement Benefits”); (iii)(ii) dividend equivalent amounts paid to Messrs. Ridge and Noble with respect to vested RSUs and vested DPUs held by each of them that are vested and that will not be settled in shares until termination of employment and dividend equivalent amounts paid to each of the NEOs with respect to Vested DPUs that will not be settled in shares until termination of employment (“Dividend Equivalents”); (iv)(iii) the value of supplemental life insurance benefits received by Messrs. Ridge and Rembolt described below under the heading, Supplemental Death Benefit Plans and Supplemental Insurance Benefits (“Death Benefits”); and (v) a taxable payment made to Mr. Noble in lieu of a retirement plan contribution under the U.K. retirement benefit program that would, if contributed to the retirement plan, result in adverse tax consequences to Mr. Noble (“In Lieu Benefit”). Perquisites(iv) perquisites and benefits received by each of the NEOswhich include group life, medical, dental, vision, wellness and other insurance benefits (“Welfare Benefits”); and (v) vehicle allowance costs which include lease or depreciation expense, fuel, maintenance and insurance costs for each NEO other than Mr. Noble, and a cash allowance and fuel for Mr. Noble (“Vehicle Allowance”).



33


The following table sets forthspecifies the separate amounts included in All Other Compensation for fiscal year 20192022 for each of the NEOs:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Executive Officer

 

Retirement Benefits

 

Dividend Equivalents

 

Death Benefits

 

In Lieu Benefit

 

Welfare Benefits

 

Vehicle Allowance

 

Total All Other
Compensation



Garry O. Ridge

 

$             46,389 

 

$             16,237 

 

$               5,270 

 

$                       - 

 

$             32,799 

 

$             14,653 

 

$                    115,347 



Jay W. Rembolt

 

$             46,389 

 

$                  735 

 

$               5,425 

 

$                       - 

 

$             31,100 

 

$             14,998 

 

$                      98,645 



Steven A. Brass

 

$             46,389 

 

$                  256 

 

$                       - 

 

$                       - 

 

$             31,284 

 

$             14,721 

 

$                      92,651 



Richard T. Clampitt

 

$             46,389 

 

$                  424 

 

$                       - 

 

$                       - 

 

$             19,236 

 

$             17,008 

 

$                      83,058 



William B. Noble

 

$                       - 

 

$             10,075 

 

$                       - 

 

$             45,951 

 

$               8,099 

 

$             16,661 

 

$                      80,786 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officer

 

Retirement Benefits

 

Dividend Equivalents

 

Death Benefits

 

Welfare Benefits

 

Vehicle Allowance

 

Total All Other
Compensation

Garry O. Ridge

 

$             50,000 

 

$             20,964 

 

$               8,236 

 

$             40,180 

 

$             18,000 

 

$                    137,381 

Steven A. Brass

 

$             50,000 

 

$                  330 

 

$                       - 

 

$             36,951 

 

$             13,899 

 

$                    101,180 

Jay W. Rembolt

 

$             50,000 

 

$                  949 

 

$               7,615 

 

$             36,412 

 

$             13,493 

 

$                    108,469 

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

$             50,000 

 

$                       - 

 

$                       - 

 

$             22,355 

 

$             18,000 

 

$                      90,355 

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

$             50,000 

 

$                  272 

 

$                       - 

 

$             36,382 

 

$             18,000 

 

$                    104,654 



4

Mr. Noble’s Salary, Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation and All Other Compensation for each fiscal year have been converted from Great Britain pounds sterling (“GBP”) at average annual exchange rates for the year as follows: for fiscal year 2019 at $1.2859 per GBP, for fiscal year 2018 at $1.3475 per GBP, and for fiscal year 2017 at $1.2678 per GBP.

31




GRANTS OF PLAN-BASEDPLAN-BASED AWARDS -  FISCAL YEAR 20192022

 

In December 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved the WD-40 Company 2016 Stock Incentive Plan to authorize the issuance of stock-based compensation awards to employees, directors and consultants. In addition to base salary and the Performance Incentive Compensation for fiscal year 2019 the executive officers2022, NEOs were granted RSU,  MSU and DPUPSU awards under the Company’Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan.Plan as shown in the table below.  Descriptions of the RSU, MSU and DPUPSU awards are provided above in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section under the heading, Equity Compensation. 



Information concerning the grant of RSU, MSU and DPU awards to the NEOs is provided in the following Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. The table also contains information with respect to Performance Incentive Program opportunity awards for fiscal year 20192022 as described above in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section under the heading, Performance Incentive Program. The table provides threshold, target and maximum payout information relating to the Company’s fiscal year 20192022 Performance Incentive Program. 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards1

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards1

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards2

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Threshold
($)

 

Target
($)

 

Maximum
($)

 

Threshold
(#)

 

Target
(#)

 

Maximum
(#)

 


All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock or Units3  
(#)

 

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Options Awards4
($)

 

Grant Date

 

Threshold
($)

 

Target
($)

 

Maximum
($)

 

Threshold
(#)

 

Target
(#)

 

Maximum
(#)

 


All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock or Units3  
(#)

 

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Options Awards4
($)

Garry O. Ridge

 

10/8/2018

 

$              1 

 

$   662,000 

 

$      1,324,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/12/2021

 

$              1 

 

$   692,121 

 

$      1,384,242 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/12/2021 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,738 

 

3,476 

 

6,952 

 

 

 

$        870,008 

 

10/12/2021 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,476

 

$        780,049 

 

10/12/2021 (PSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

146 

 

 

 

2,934 

 

 

 

 -

 

03/17/2022 (RSU)5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,347

 

$        971,176 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven A. Brass

 

10/12/2021

 

$              1 

 

$   366,067 

 

$         732,133 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/8/2018 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,997 

 

3,994 

 

7,988 

 

 

 

$        775,076 

 

10/12/2021 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

869 

 

1,738 

 

3,476 

 

 

 

$        435,004 

 

10/8/2018 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,994

 

$        630,133 

 

10/12/2021 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,738

 

$        390,025 

 

10/8/2018 (DPU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

199 

 

 

 

3,987 

 

 

 

$                    - 

 

10/12/2021 (PSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77 

 

 

 

1,551 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jay W. Rembolt

 

10/8/2018

 

$              1 

 

$   160,300 

 

$         320,599 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/12/2021

 

$              1 

 

$   167,593 

 

$         335,186 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/8/2018 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

422 

 

845 

 

1,690 

 

 

 

$        163,981 

 

10/12/2021 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

380 

 

760 

 

1,520 

 

 

 

$        190,220 

 

10/8/2018 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

845

 

$        133,316 

 

10/12/2021 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

760

 

$        170,552 

 

10/8/2018 (DPU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48 

 

 

 

965 

 

 

 

$                    - 

 

10/12/2021 (PSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35 

 

 

 

710 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven A. Brass

 

10/8/2018

 

$              1 

 

$   179,674 

 

$         359,347 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

10/12/2021

 

$              1 

 

$   122,232 

 

$         244,463 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/8/2018 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

307 

 

614 

 

1,228 

 

 

 

$        119,153 

 

10/12/2021 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

277 

 

554 

 

1,108 

 

 

 

$        138,661 

 

10/8/2018 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

614

 

$          96,871 

 

10/12/2021 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

554

 

$        124,323 

 

10/8/2018 (DPU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48 

 

 

 

960 

 

 

 

$                    - 

 

10/12/2021 (PSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25 

 

 

 

518 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Richard T. Clampitt

 

10/8/2018

 

$              1 

 

$   112,438 

 

$         224,875 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

10/12/2021

 

$              1 

 

$   181,727 

 

$         363,454 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/8/2018 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

230 

 

460 

 

920 

 

 

 

$          89,268 

 

10/12/2021 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

380 

 

760 

 

1,520 

 

 

 

$        190,220 

 

10/8/2018 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

460

 

$          72,574 

 

10/12/2021 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

760

 

$        170,552 

 

10/8/2018 (DPU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33 

 

 

 

677 

 

 

 

$                    - 

 

10/12/2021 (PSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35 

 

 

 

717 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William B. Noble5

 

10/8/2018

 

$              1 

 

$   136,401 

 

$         272,801 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10/8/2018 (MSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

230 

 

460 

 

920 

 

 

 

$          89,268 

 

10/8/2018 (RSU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

460

 

$          72,574 

 

10/8/2018 (DPU)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43 

 

 

 

861 

 

 

 

$                    - 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

The Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent Threshold, Target and Maximum payouts under the WD-40 Company Performance Incentive Compensation Plan for Incentive Compensation payable for fiscal year 20192022 performance. The Target amount represents fifty percent50% of the Maximum payout for each NEO. The Maximum amount represents the Incentive Compensation opportunity for each NEO that assumes full achievement of the performance measures for Level  A of the Performance Incentive Program (as more

34


fully discussed above in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section under the heading, Performance Incentive Program)Program) and attainment by the Company of a level of Global Adjusted EBITDA sufficient to maximize such payouts under Level C of the Performance Incentive Program.  

2

The Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent the Threshold, Target and Maximum number of shares to be issued upon performance vesting of MSU and DPUPSU awards as described in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section under the heading, Equity Compensation.Compensation. There is no applicable Target number of shares for DPUPSU awards to be earned by the NEOs.

3

All Other Stock Awards represent RSUs described in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section under the heading, Equity Compensation.  Compensation.

4

Information relating to the amounts disclosed as the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards is included in footnote 1 to the Summary Compensation Table above.

5

Shares vest on June 30, 2023.

32


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 20192022 FISCAL YEAR END

 

The following table provides detailed information concerning the RSU and MSU awards that were not vested as of the end of the last fiscal year for each of the NEOs:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Stock Awards

Name

 

Number of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)1

 

Market Value of  Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)2

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)3

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of  Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)4

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not
Vested
(#)1

 

Market Value of  Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)2

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)3

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of  Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)2

Garry O. Ridge

 

8,322 

 

$          1,517,101 

 

25,356 

 

$          4,622,399 

 

12,876 

 

$          2,435,624 

 

14,944 

 

$                        2,826,807 

Steven A. Brass

 

3,631 

 

$             686,840 

 

7,472 

 

$                        1,413,404 

Jay W. Rembolt

 

1,629 

 

$             296,967 

 

4,850 

 

$             884,155 

 

1,519 

 

$             287,334 

 

3,018 

 

$                           570,885 

Steven A. Brass

 

1,442 

 

$             262,877 

 

4,131 

 

$             753,081 

Richard T. Clampitt

 

1,119 

 

$             203,994 

 

3,592 

 

$             654,822 

William B. Noble

 

956 

 

$             174,279 

 

2,922 

 

$             532,681 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

554 

 

$             104,795 

 

1,108 

 

$                           209,589 

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

1,566 

 

$             296,225 

 

3,268 

 

$                           618,175 

1

Represents RSU awards to the NEOs that were not vested as of the fiscal year end.

2

The Market Value of the RSU awardsshares or units that were not vested as of the fiscal year end was $182.30is based on $189.16 per share or unit, determined by reference towhich was the closing price forof the Company’s common stock as ofon August 31, 2019.2022.  

3

Represents the maximum number of shares to be issued with respect to MSU awards granted to the NEOs that were not vested as of the fiscal year end. The maximum number of shares to be issued with respect to MSU awards equals the number of shares to be issued with respect to the MSU  awards upon achievement of the highest level of achievement for such MSU awards as described above in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section under the heading, Equity Compensation.  

4

The Market Value of the maximum number of shares to be issued with respect to unvestedCompensation.  MSU awards at fiscal year end was $182.30 per share, determined by reference tofrom October 2019 that would have vested in October 2022 had the closing price for the Company’s common stock as of August 31, 2019.performance targets been attained and certified are excluded. 





OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED - FISCAL YEAR 20192022



No shares of the Company’s common stock were acquired on exercise of stock options in the Company’s last fiscal year for the NEOs. The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company’s common stock acquired upon the vesting of RSU and MSU awards in the Company’s last fiscal year and the aggregate dollar value realized with respect to such vested RSU awards. No shares of restricted stock were issued with respect to MSU and MSU awards.PSU awards that would have vested on August 31, 2022 had performance targets been attained.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

Executive Officer

 

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting1
(#)

 

Value Realized
on Vesting2
($)

 

 

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting1
(#)

 

Value Realized
on Vesting2
($)

Garry O. Ridge

 

13,203 

 

$        2,132,945

 

 

12,083

 

$        2,634,457

Steven A. Brass

 

2,685

 

$           585,411

Jay W. Rembolt

 

2,647 

 

$           427,623

 

 

2,488

 

$           542,459

Steven A. Brass

 

1,143 

 

$           184,652

 

Richard T. Clampitt

 

2,263 

 

$           365,588

 

William B. Noble

 

1,667 

 

$           269,304

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

 -

 

$                      -

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

1,141

 

$           248,772

1

The Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting for each NEO includes shares of the Company’s common stock issued on October 22,  2021 upon vesting of RSU and MSU awards on October 23, 2018.awards.     

35


2

The Value Realized on Vesting for shares of the Company’s common stock issuedRSUs on October 23, 201822,  2021 is calculated based on the number of vested RSU and MSU awards multiplied by the closing price of $161.55$218.03 for the Company’s common stock as of thaton such date.



33


NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION – FISCAL YEAR 20192022 



The following table provides information concerning compensation received by the NEOs that is subject to deferral under applicable RSU and DPU award agreements: 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officer

 

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY1
($)

 

Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE2
($)

Named Executive Officer

 

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY1
($)

 

Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE2
($)

Garry O. Ridge

 

$            33,227

 

$       1,248,937

 

$        (345,770)

 

$        1,295,935

Jay W. Rembolt

 

$              1,504

 

$            56,513

 

$          (15,646)

 

$             58,640

Steven A. Brass

 

$                 524

 

$            19,688

 

$            (5,451)

 

$             20,429

Richard T. Clampitt

 

$                 868

 

$            32,632

William B. Noble

 

$            20,617

 

$          774,957

 

 

 

 

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

$                    -

 

$                       -

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

$            (4,492)

 

$             16,835

 

1

The Aggregate Earnings in Last FY represents the increasedecrease in value from August 31, 20182021 to August 31, 20192022 of the shares underlying deferred settlement RSUs and Vestedvested DPUs held by each NEO that will be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock following termination of employment as disclosed in footnotes to the table under the heading, Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers.Officers. The number of such deferred settlement RSUs and Vestedvested DPUs for each NEO was multiplied by the difference in the closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 31, 20192022 of $182.30$189.16 and on August 31, 20182021 of $177.45,  an increase$239.63, a decrease in value of $4.85$50.47 per share. Amounts included as the Aggregate Earnings in Last FYshown are not otherwise included as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2019.  2022.  

2

The Aggregate Balance at Last FYE represents the value as of August 31, 20192022 of the deferred settlement RSUs and Vestedany vested DPUs held by each NEO as noted in the footnote above. The value for each deferred settlement RSU and each Vestedvested DPU is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as ofon August 31, 2019 in the amount of $182.302022, which was $189.16 per share. The underlying deferred settlement RSUs and Vestedvested DPUs were included in prior disclosures for the NEOs to the extent that the NEOs were included in Summary Compensation Table disclosures for the years in which such awards were first granted to the NEOs. 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DEATH BENEFIT PLANS ANDAND SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE BENEFITS 



The Company maintains Supplemental Death Benefit Plans for Messrs. Ridge and Rembolt.Rembolt, which will terminate upon their separation from the Company as an employee. Under the death benefit plan agreements, the NEO’s designated beneficiary or estate, as applicable, will receive a death benefit equal to the NEO’s then current base salary in the event of his death prior to retirement from the Company. AllEach of the NEOs areis also eligible to receive life insurance benefits offered to all employees of the Company and, in the case of Mr. Noble, to all employees of the Company’s U.K. subsidiary.Company.



The death benefits under the Supplemental Death Benefit Plans are not formally funded but the Company has purchased key man life insurance policies owned by the Company to cover its benefit obligations. Non-employee directors do not have death benefit plan agreements.



Based upon their fiscal year 20192022 base salaries, the supplemental death benefit to be provided to Messrs.  Ridge and Rembolt as of the end of fiscal year 20192022 would have been as set forth in the following table:  

 



 

 



 

 

Named Executive Officer

 

Death Benefit

Garry O. Ridge

 

$          662,000692,121

Jay W. Rembolt

 

$          320,599

Steven A. Brass

$                -

Richard T. Clampitt

$                -

William B. Noble

$                -

335,186



CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS

 

CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS

Each executive officer serves at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company has entered into Change of Control Severance Agreements (“SeveranceCoC Agreements”) with each of the NEOs. The SeveranceCoC Agreements provide that each executive officer will receive certain severance benefits if his or her employment is terminated without “Cause” or if he or she resigns for “Good Reason”,Reason,” as those terms are defined in the SeveranceCoC Agreements, within two years after a “Change of Control”

34


as defined in the SeveranceCoC Agreements and summarized below. If the executive officer’s employment is terminated during the aforementioned two-year period by the Company without “Cause” or by the executive officer for “Good Reason”, the executive officer will be entitled to a lump sum payment (subject to limits provided by reference to Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code which limits the deductibility of certain payments to executives upon a change in control) of twice the executive officer’s salary, calculated based on the greater of the executive officer’s then current annual salary or a five-year

36


average, plus twice the executive officer’s earned Incentive Compensation, calculated based on the greater of the most recent annual earned Incentive Compensation or a five-year average. Further, any of the executive officer’s outstanding equity incentive awards that are not then fully vested (with the exception of DPUPSU awards), will be accelerated and vested in full following such termination of employment within such two-year period and the executive officer will be entitled to continuation of health and welfare benefits under the Company’s then existing benefit plans or equivalent benefits for a period of up to two years from the date of termination of employment. No employment rights or benefits other than the change of control severance benefits described in this paragraph are provided by the SeveranceCoC Agreements.

 

For purposes of the SeveranceCoC Agreements and subject to the express provisions and limitations contained therein, a “Change of Control” means a transaction or series of transactions by which a person or persons acting together acquire more than 30% of the Company’s outstanding shares; a change in a majority of the incumbent members of the Company’s Board of Directors as specified in the SeveranceCoC Agreements, a reorganization, merger or consolidation as specified in the SeveranceCoC Agreements or a sale of substantially all of the assets or complete liquidation of the Company. As specified more particularly in the SeveranceCoC Agreements, a “Change of Control” does not include a reorganization, merger or consolidation or a sale or liquidation where a majority of the incumbent members of the Company’s Board of Directors continue in office and more than 60% of the successor company’s shares are owned by the Company’s pre-transaction stockholders.



The SeveranceCoC Agreements have a term of two years, subject to automatic renewal for successive two yeartwo-year periods unless notice of non-renewal is provided by the Company’s Board of Directors not less than six months prior to the end of the current term. The term of the SeveranceCoC Agreements will be automatically extended for a term of two years following any “Change of Control.”



The following table sets forth the estimated amounts payable to each of the NEOs pursuant to their respective SeveranceCoC Agreements on the assumption that the employment of each NEO was terminated without “Cause” or otherwise for “Good Reason” effective as of the end of fiscal year 20192022 following a “Change of Control” as provided for in the SeveranceCoC Agreements. The table also includes the value, as of the end of the fiscal year, of all unvested RSU and MSU awards that were not vested as of the end of fiscal year 2019.2022.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officer

 

Severance Pay1

 

Welfare Benefits2

 

Accelerated Vesting of
RSUs and MSUs3

 

Total Change of
Control Severance
Benefits

Garry O. Ridge

 

$                    2,720,222

 

$                         58,993

 

$                    3,828,300

 

$                    6,607,515

Jay W. Rembolt

 

$                    1,038,946

 

$                         58,593

 

$                       739,045

 

$                    1,836,584

Steven A. Brass

 

$                    1,199,094

 

$                         58,593

 

$                       675,057

 

$                    1,932,744

Richard T. Clampitt

 

$                       840,308

 

$                         35,233

 

$                       531,405

 

$                    1,406,946

William B. Noble

 

$                       847,755

 

$                           8,762

 

$                       440,619

 

$                    1,297,136



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officer

 

Severance Pay1

 

Welfare Benefits2

 

Accelerated Vesting of
RSUs and MSUs3

 

Total Change of
Control Severance
Benefits

Garry O. Ridge4

 

$                    4,085,202

 

$                         73,491

 

$                    3,849,028

 

$                    8,007,721

Jay W. Rembolt

 

$                    1,324,394

 

$                         69,091

 

$     ��                 572,776

 

$                    1,966,261

Steven A. Brass

 

$                    2,343,716

 

$                         69,091

 

$                    1,393,542

 

$                    3,806,349

Phenix Q. Kiamilev

 

$                       671,673

 

$                         41,555

 

$                       209,590

 

$                       922,818

Patricia Q. Olsem

 

$                    1,248,970

 

$                         69,091

 

$                       605,312

 

$                    1,923,373



1

For each NEO other than Mr. Noble,, Severance Pay includes two times the Salary reported Salaryin the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 20192022 plus two times the reported Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation received for fiscal year 2018. For Mr. Noble, Severance Pay includes two times the reported Salary for fiscal year 2019 plus two times the average reported Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation for the five years ended August 31, 2018.2021.

2

For each NEO, Welfare Benefits includes an estimate of the Company’s cost to provide two years of continuation coverage under the Company’s welfare benefit plans, which does not include life insurance or long-term disability insurance. The estimate is based on the Company’s cost of such coverage for fiscal year 2022. 

3

Acceleration of vesting of RSU and MSU awards is governed by applicable provisions of the SeveranceCoC Agreements and the RSU and MSU Award Agreements. The value included for accelerated vesting of RSU and MSU awards equals the value of the RSU and MSU awards that were not vested at $182.30 for each RSU and MSUis based on $189.16, the closing price forof the Company’s common stock as ofon August 31, 2019.2022.  Except for MSUs awards from October 7, 2019 that did not vest because attainment was not achieved and therefore lapsed, MSUs awarded are valued for this purpose based upon the Target Number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued with respect to the MSUs as described above in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A section under the heading, Equity Compensation.Compensation.

4Mr. Ridge’s CoC Agreement terminated on August 31, 2022 pursuant to the terms of the Transition Agreement (defined below).

SUMMARY OF TRANSITION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT WITH GARRY O. RIDGE

In connection with Mr. Ridge’s retirement as CEO and Chairman of the Board, the Company and Mr. Ridge entered into a Transition and Release Agreement on March 11, 2022 (“Transition Agreement”).  The Transition Agreement provides that Mr. Ridge retires as CEO, effective August 31, 2022, that he remains an employee of the Company until January 2, 2023, that he be compensated $34,606 per month effective September 1, 2022, and that he serves as Chairman of the Board until his term expires on December 13, 2022. Mr. Ridge’s outstanding equity awards continue to be treated in accordance with the terms in their respective award agreements, and he will not be eligible for any grants of equity awards in fiscal year 2023. As of January 3, 2023, Mr. Ridge will serve as a consultant to the Company at a monthly rate of $34,606 and will continue to provide leadership support and other advisory services to Mr. Brass, who was appointed CEO effective September 1, 2022, and the Board until June 30, 2023.

3537

 


 

As consideration for Mr. Ridge’s execution of waivers and releases of claims and covenants in favor of the Company,  and in order to help effect an orderly CEO transition to ensure continued alignment and focus on long-term stockholder interests, the Company granted RSUs  approximately equal to $1,000,000 in March 2022 pursuant to the terms of the Transition Agreement and agreed to provide 36 months of COBRA coverage. The grant of 5,347 RSUs in March 2022 is reflected in the applicable tables disclosing Mr. Ridge’s stock awards and beneficial ownership in this Proxy Statement.      

The Transition Agreement and related agreements are filed as exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2022.

CEO PAY RATIO



As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the SEC, the pay ratio disclosure rule, we are providing the ratio of the total annual compensation of our CEO, Mr. Ridge, to that of the Company’s “median employee” for fiscal year 2019. For fiscal year 2019, the pay ratio of the CEO’s compensation to the median employee’s compensation2022 was approximately 34 to 42:1.

As authorized by applicable To determine the CEO pay ratio, disclosures, wethe total annual compensation for the median employee for fiscal year 2022 was calculated to be $87,169, which included the same elements of compensation required to be in the Summary Compensation Table, and was calculated in the same manner as the CEO’s total annual compensation, which was $3,632,412 for fiscal year 2022.

SEC rules allow the Company to identify its median employee once every three years unless there has been a change in its employee population or employee compensation arrangements that it reasonably believes would result in a significant change in its pay ratio disclosure. The Company used the same median employee for fiscal year 2022 as fiscal year 2021, after considering the changes to employee population and compensation programs during 2022, as well as the 2022 compensation of the median employee.

We identified the Company’s median employee from all 557 employees of the Company (excluding the CEO) as of August 31, 2018.  During the year ended August 31, 2019 there were no changes in the Company’s employee population or compensation practices that could reasonably result in a significant change in the reported pay ratio disclosure. In identifying the Company’s median employee as of August 31, 2018 we2021. We included all worldwide employees, including full-time, part-time and temporary employees. As of August 31, 2018, the Company employed 491 individualsemployees, located in 15 countries.  As of August 31, 2019, the Company employed 509 individuals located in 15 countries.

For purposes of identifying17 countries at such time. To identify the Company’s median employee as of August 31, 2018,in fiscal year 2021, we calculated total compensation for fiscal year 20182021 for each employee other than the CEO by including salary or regular hourly wages paid in the fiscal year, Incentive Compensation paid during the fiscal year under the Company’s Performance Incentive Program, and the grant date value of equity awards (RSUsRSUs and MSUs)MSUs granted to employees in the fiscal year.  Compensation paid to employees who were hired after the beginning of the fiscal year 2021 or who terminated prior to the end of the fiscal year 2021 was not annualized. For employees who received compensation denominated in a foreign currency, such amounts were converted to U.S. dollars atusing average annual exchange rates as of August 31, 2018.2021. 



To determineAs of August 31, 2022, the CEO pay ratio, the total annual compensation for the median employee was calculated for fiscal year 2019 by including all elements of compensation required to be includedCompany employed 603 employees located in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2019 in the same manner as such compensation was calculated for the CEO.15 countries. The Company’s median employee is located in the United States.  U.S.



For fiscal year 2019, the total annual compensation of our CEO was $3,079,841 and the total annual compensation of our median employee was $90,849.  Accordingly, the ratio of the total annual compensation of our CEO to that of our median employee was approximately 34 to 1.EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION



The following table sets forth certain equity compensation plan information as of August 31, 2022:



 

 

 



 

 

 



Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

Plan category

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)

 

136,9372

 

N/A

 

384,859

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

Total

136,937

N/A

384,859

(1)The 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, which authorizes the grant of 1,000,000 shares of common stock, was approved by our stockholders at our 2016 annual meeting.

(2)

Represents shares of common stock subject to unvested 78,604 RSUs, vested 3,306 DPUs, and 37,201 MSU and 17,826 PSU awards assuming the issuance of shares based on target performance.

3638

 


 

AUDIT-RELATED MATTERS

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Accounting Firm

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC (“PwC”) for fiscal years 2022 and 2021:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Audit fees1

 

$

1,642,950 

 

 

$

1,398,900 

 

Audit-related fees2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax fees3

 

$

189,025 

 

 

 $

217,925 

 

All other fees4

 

$

900 

 

 

 $

2,700 

 

Total fees

 

$

1,832,875 

 

 

$

1,619,525 

 

1Professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements, the review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, and services normally provided by PwC in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

2Assurance and related services reasonably related to the audit and/or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements that are not reported under “Audit Fees.”.

3Tax return preparation, tax compliance, tax advice and/or tax planning services

4Access provided by PwC to its online research reference and disclosure checklist materials

The possible effect on the independence of the auditor is considered by the Audit Committee. There is no direct or indirect understanding or agreement that places a limit on current or future years’ audit fees or permissible non-audit products and services.

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit products and services provided by the auditor. These products and services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services, software and other products or services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The auditor and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the auditor in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. All services described above received pre-approval pursuant to policies and procedures that were established to comply with SEC rules that require pre-approval of audit and non-audit services.

Related Party Transactions Review and Oversight

The Audit Committee has responsibility for review and oversight of related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest. Related party transactions include any independent business dealings between the Company and related parties who consist of, or are related to, the Company’s executive officers, directors, director nominees and holders of more than 5% of the Company’s shares. Such transactions include business dealings with parties in which any related party has a material direct or indirect interest. The Audit Committee has adopted a written policy to provide for its review and oversight of related party transactions. Executive officers and directors are required to notify the Corporate Secretary of the Company of any proposed or existing related party transactions in which they have an interest. The Corporate Secretary and the Audit Committee also rely upon the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures adopted pursuant to Exchange Act rules for the purpose of assuring that matters requiring disclosure, including transactions that may involve a related party or may otherwise involve the potential for conflicts of interests, are brought to the attention of management and the Audit Committee on a timely basis. Certain related party transactions do not require Audit Committee review and approval. Such transactions are considered pre-approved. Pre-approved transactions include:

·

compensation arrangements approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board and expense reimbursements consistent with the Company’s expense reimbursement policy;

·

transactions in which the related party’s interest is derived solely from the fact that he or she serves as a director of another corporation that is a party to the transaction;

39


·

transactions in which the related party’s interest is derived solely from his or her ownership (combined with the ownership interests of all other related parties) of not more than a 5% beneficial interest (but excluding any interest as a general partner of a partnership) in an entity that is a party to the transaction; and

·

transactions available to all employees of the Company generally.

If a related party transaction is proposed or if an existing transaction is identified, the Audit Committee has authority to disapprove, approve or ratify the transaction and to impose such restrictions or other limitations on the transaction as the Committee may consider necessary to best assure that the interests of the Company are protected and that the related party involved is not in a position to receive an improper benefit. In making such determination, the Audit Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate, including without limitation (i) the benefits to the Company of the transaction; (ii) the commercial reasonableness of the terms of the transaction; (iii) the dollar value of the transaction and its materiality to the Company and to the related party; (iv) the nature and extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction; (v) if applicable, the impact of the transaction on a non-employee director’s independence; and (vi) the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related party participating in the transaction.

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2021, there were no transactions required to be reported pursuant to the requirements of Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

In accordance with its Charter,charter, the Audit Committee provides assistance to the Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”) in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing, and reporting practices of the Company, including assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence criteria prescribed by applicable regulations and rules of the SEC for audit committee membership and is an “independent director” within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards. 

Management is responsible for preparing the Company’s financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaU.S. (“GAAP”) and for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (“auditor”) is responsible for performing an integrated audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and expressing opinions as to whether the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and as to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019.2022. The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with management the audited financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with the Company’s auditor the audited financial statements and the auditor’s attestation report regarding effectiveness of management’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee also discussed with the auditor those matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, which provides that certain matters related to the conduct of the financial statement audit are to be communicated to the Audit Committee. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee met separately with management and separately with the Company’s auditor to discuss results of audit examinations and evaluations of internal controls. 

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation, and oversight of the Company’s auditor. In this regard, the Audit Committee discussed with the auditor theirits independence from management and the Company, including matters in written documents and a  letter received from the auditor as required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence. In evaluating the auditor’s independence, the Audit Committee also considered whether the auditor’s provision of any non-audit services impaired or compromised the firm’sits independence.

The Audit Committee considered several factors in selecting PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s auditor, including the firm’sits independence and internal quality controls, the overall depth of talent, and theirits familiarity with the Company’s businesses and internal controls over financial reporting. Further, in conjunction with the mandated rotation of auditing firm’s coordinatingan auditor’s lead, concurring and/or relationship partner (each an “audit partner”), the Audit Committee and its chair oversee and are directly involved in the selection process for any change in coordinatingaudit partners.



40


Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in its annual report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended August 31, 2019,2022, and that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPwC serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmauditor for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2020. 2023. 



Audit Committee

Daniel T. Carter, Chair

Daniel E. Pittard Lara L. Lee

Anne G. SaundersEdward O. Magee, Jr.

Neal E. Schmale Trevor I. Mihalik

Graciela I. Monteagudo

David B. Pendarvis



STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR OUR 2023 ANNUAL MEETING

For a stockholder proposal otherwise satisfying the eligibility requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 to be considered for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for our 2023 annual meeting, it must be received by us at our principal office, 9715 Businesspark Avenue, San Diego, CA 92131 on or before July 6, 2023.

For an eligible stockholder or group of stockholders to nominate a director nominee for election at our 2023 annual meeting pursuant to the proxy access provision of our Bylaws, such eligible stockholder or group of stockholders must comply with the then current advance notice requirements in our Bylaws and deliver the proposal to our Corporate Secretary between June 6, 2023 and July 6, 2023 in order for such proposal to be considered timely. In addition, our Bylaws require the eligible stockholder or group of stockholders to update and supplement such information as of specified dates.

In addition, if a stockholder desires to bring business (including director nominations) before our 2023 annual meeting that is not the subject of a proposal timely submitted for inclusion in our 2023 Proxy Statement, written notice of such business, as currently prescribed in our Bylaws, must be received by our Corporate Secretary between June 6, 2023 and 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on July 6, 2023. For additional requirements, a stockholder may refer to our current Bylaws, Article II, Section 2.15,  “Nomination of Directors,” and Article II, Section 2.17, “Proxy Access,” a copy of which may be obtained from our Corporate Secretary upon request and without charge. See “Stockholder Communications with the Board” for contact information. If we do not receive timely notice pursuant to our Bylaws, the proposal will be excluded from consideration at the annual meeting.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees for the 2023 annual meeting other than our nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than October 14, 2023.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. When used in this Proxy Statement, the words “estimated,” “anticipated,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include discussions of strategy, plans or intentions of management. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions about the Company, and future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Proxy Statement. While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Proxy Statement or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

41


INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, which might incorporate future filings made by us under those statutes, the preceding Compensation Committee Report and Audit Committee Report will not be incorporated by reference into any of those prior filings, nor will any such reports be incorporated by reference into any future filings made by the Company under those statutes. In addition, information on our website, other than our Proxy Statement, Notice of Annual Meeting and form of proxy, is not part of the proxy soliciting material and is not incorporated herein by reference.

 By Order of the Board of Directors, 

Phenix Q. Kiamilev 

Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Dated: November 2, 2022



 

37


ITEM NO. 3

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for fiscal year 2020. Although ratification by stockholders is not required by law, the Audit Committee has determined that it is desirable to request ratification of this selection by the stockholders. Notwithstanding its selection, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection.

A majority of the votes of the common stock present or represented at the meeting is required for approval. Broker non-votes will be voted in favor of approval. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP acted as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm during the past fiscal year and, unless the Audit Committee appoints new independent accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will continue to act in such capacity during the current fiscal year. It is anticipated that a representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit products and services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These products and services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services, software and other products or services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent accountants and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent public accountants in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. The possible effect on the independence of the public accountants is considered by the Audit Committee. There is no direct or indirect understanding or agreement that places a limit on current or future years’ audit fees or permissible non-audit products and services.

AUDIT FEES

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has provided audit services to the Company for each of the past two fiscal years. Audit fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements, the review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. The aggregate fees billed to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for audit services performed for the Company for the past two fiscal years were $1,283,996 for the year ended August 31, 2019, and $1,069,296 for the year ended August 31, 2018. 

AUDIT-RELATED FEES 

Audit-related services consist of assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” Audit-related services billed to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were $64,820 for the year ended August 31, 2019, and $64,500 for the year ended August 31, 2018.  The fees for fiscal year 2019 were associated with discussions, review and testing of certain information related to the adoption of Accounting Standard Update No. 2016-02, “Leases”, which will be adopted by the Company in fiscal year 2020. Such fees for fiscal year 2018 were related to discussions, review and testing of certain information related to the adoption of Accounting Standard No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which the Company adopted in fiscal year 2019.    

TAX FEES

Tax fees consist of tax compliance, tax advice, tax consulting or tax planning services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the Company. Tax fees billed to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were $45,000 for the year-ended August 31, 2019, and were associated with tax consulting services. No such fees were billed to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the year-ended August 31, 2018.

38


ALL OTHER FEES

Other fees for services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 consisted of fees for access provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to its online research reference and disclosure checklist materials. Other fees for fiscal year 2019 also include fees associated with process evaluation advisory services. The aggregate fees billed to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for other services performed for the Company were $47,766 for the year ended August 31, 2019, and $2,700 for the year ended August 31, 2018. 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder proposals must be received by the Company no sooner than June 3, 2020 and not later than July 3, 2020 to be included in the Proxy Statement and form of proxy for the next annual meeting. Any proposal submitted outside of these dates will be considered untimely in order to be considered at the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws.

 By Order of the Board of Directors

Richard T. Clampitt

Corporate Secretary

Dated: October 31, 2019

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXIES BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. THEREFORE, STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO FILL IN, SIGN AND RETURN THE ACCOMPANYING FORM OR FORMS OF PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

3942

 


 



Picture 3

Picture 3

 

 


 

Picture 7Picture 4